To: piasa
Thanks. I think the 1988 (sic) Army service is just a typo for '98. The article has '88 once, and '98 twice.
To: aristeides
Yes, looks like you're right, thanks.
108 posted on
08/01/2002 8:17:01 PM PDT by
piasa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson