Skip to comments.
Impeach George Bush Dick Cheney The Republican Congress and the Supreme Court 5!
Democrats.com ^
| recent
| Unknown
Posted on 07/25/2002 11:53:18 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-172 last
To: ppaul
Watch out now, or I'll have a homeboy run you over with his fiffy-seben chebby.
To: Admin Moderator
But, he could have at least included a MEGA-BARF ALERT!
162
posted on
07/27/2002 6:32:47 PM PDT
by
nomad
To: fight_truth_decay; mtngrl@vrwc; Miss Marple; MJY1288; justshe; GretchenEE; kayak; kitkat; ...
Wow! Theres a bunch of good stuff on that list! Keep it up, Mr. President!
To: Admin Moderator
Does FR choose to provide bandwidth for the promulgation of this delusional pornography?
FReegards -- Brian
To: fight_truth_decay
Truth, sometimes teaching an old dog new tricks can be much harder than it seems. I'm an old dog, how old, well let's just say I've been down the road long enough to forget where I buried all the bones. Anyway, I suppose you're right about exposing the rats for what they are. So posting this piece here helps expose their idiocy for what it is. I just get very frustrated with the bombardment of demagoguery from the left.
About "winning one over," I applaud your idealism but please excuse my skepticism here. See I'm a Vietnam vet and I saw the "winning the hearts and minds" campaign in full swing. It didn't work. So call me skeptical, cynical, incredulous and any other adjective you can think of but...(whispering in your ear: I don't buy that one.) These people are brain dead. Have they stopped their lunacy since 911? No, it's probably doubled. The PC crowd is even more PC and demanding we bend over and take one in the shorts so the Arabs living in this country don't feel threatened. (Never mind that we feel threatened by their presence here.) The gobment schools and their teachers are even more determined to "indoctrinate" our children. (not mine they go to private school.) They have incrementally taken more and more and more of your freedoms away day by day by day by day.
So, Truth, when you say "Save just One Liberal," I remember a phrase the Vietnamese used to throw at us when they knew something was impossible or unlikely... nevah happen GI!
One tired old dog,
ROB
To: reillyoburbank
See..the Democrats are afraid of people like yourself ,Reilly; Haven't you noticed how "yellow" their teeth have become as they smile at you on Hannity or playing quarterback directly after the President's address....?...a whole lot of coffee,tobacco and late night takeouts from the corner deli because they are scared..of men and women..Americans such as yourself..truly wonders if Al in hind sight wished he hadnt invented the internet..."Mom,Apple Pie and Freerepublic.com"..later Reilly.
To: nomad
Nomad am new..have only just learned of the Degrees of Barf alerts..Next time!
To: willyone
Lewis Carroll? Catch 22? Joseph Heller wrote Catch 22. Carroll wrote Alice in Wonderland. Where you been? Excuse me, but that was the point. If the guy who wrote Alice in Wonderland took psychadelics and tried to write a book like "Catch 22" it would read like this article.
168
posted on
07/28/2002 9:05:54 PM PDT
by
dead
To: fight_truth_decay
Dear President Bush, With the Surpeme Court session getting ready to close, it may well be time for perhaps the most important domestic decision of your presidency: the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice(s). The main reason why I supported you in 2000 and why I wanted Daschle out of power in 02 (and 04) has to do with the courts. I want America courts to interpret law, not write law. During your presidential campaign you said Thomas and Scalia were your two model justices. Those are excellent models. The High Court needs more like them. Clarence Thomas recently said to students that the tough cases were when what he wanted to do was different from what the law said. And he goes by the law. This should be a model philosophy for our justices. Your father, President Bush lost his reelection campaign for 3 main reasosn, as far as I can see. 1. he broke the no new taxes pledge 2. David Souter 3. Clinton convinced people we were in a Bush recession (which we had already come out of by the time Clinton was getting sworn in)
I urge you to learn from all three of these: 1. on taxes, you're doing great. Awesome job on the tax cut. 2. good job so far on judicial appointments. I want to see more of a fight for Estrada, Owen, and Pickering, but I commend you on your nominations. 3. by staying engaged in the economic debate you'll serve yourself well
I have been thoroughly impressed with your handling of al Queida, Iraq, and terrorism. You have inspired confidence and have shown great leadership.
But I want to remind you that your Supreme Court pick(s) will be with us LONG after you have departed office. I urge you to avoid the tempation to find a "compromise" pick. Go for a Scalia or Thomas. Don't go for an O'Connor or Kennedy. To be specific, get someone who is pro-life. Roe v Wade is one of the worst court decisions I know of, and it's the perfect example of unrestrained judicial power.
I know the temptation will be tremendous on you to nominate a moderate. But remember who your true supporters are. I am not a important leader or politician. I am "simply" a citizen who has been an enthusiatic supporter of you. I am willing to accept compromise in many areas of government but I will watch your Court nomiantions extremely closely. What the Senate Dems are doing right now is disgusting, but as the President you have the bully pulpit to stop it. Democrats will back down if you turn up serious heat on them.
Moreover, I think public opinion is shifting towards the pro-life position. Dems will want you to nominate a moderate, but almost all will vote against you anyways. Pro-choice Repubs will likely still vote for you if you nominate a Scalia, after all, you campaigned on it. So Mr. President, I urge you to stick with your campaign statements and nominate justices who believe in judicial restraint, like Scalia and Thomas.
Happy Memorial Day and may God bless you and your family.
169
posted on
06/03/2003 5:53:48 PM PDT
by
votelife
(FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
To: fight_truth_decay
Let's take these one at a time:
"In 1999, the Republican Congress impeached President Bill Clinton after a $60 million investigation by Republican Special Prosecutor Ken Starr found no crimes by President Clinton - except consensual sex." False. The party is in denial. Defending the indefensable, the mistake of the DNC fo shill for the criminal named clinton, is still costing the DNC votes, and untill they come to grips with the parties mistake to defending the indefensable, they'll loose like 2000 and 2002.
"In 2000, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney lost the Presidential election, both nationally and in Florida"
False. The party is in denial. Your president George W. Bush and your vice president, Richard Cheney won the election of 2000 together with a majority in the house, and a majority in the senate. The 2000 vote was a landslide, a tri-fecta for the GOP that was reaffirmed in 2002.
But five Republican "justices" on the U.S. Supreme Court declared Bush the winner by throwing out 175,000 uncounted Florida votes."
False. The party is in denial. The reality is that the supreme court, quite rightfully so, sent the case back to the Florida Supreeme Court to ask them to clear up the equal treatment problem in their decision. Al lost one recount, lost a second recount, and the election was certified by the then secretary of state, now state congresswoman Kathrine Harris. Now, If good old kathy Harris did wrong, how did she get elected? If her certifying the election, one would expect the good people of FL to be less than pleased with her, but in 2002, she WON, dispite the DNC milti million dollar clinton schmear campaign.
"George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have illegally occupied the White House since January 20, 2001."
False. The party is in denial. There's nothing to add, this is simply not a true thing.
Re:Article I Section 3: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
The Seante was given all the time in the world to debate the issue in the run up to the 2002 midterm elections and, in the end the Senate approved the use of firce against the country of Iraq. In fact, they debated this so poorly that the DNC was using the same platform as the Saddoms ba'th party, and so turned off the voter with their apeasment shrill BS, the voters removed the DNC from a majority party in the Senate.
How can the party hope to atract reasonable voters when they are lieing to themselves and others?
170
posted on
06/03/2003 6:15:37 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
(Frustrate one liberal a day, that's all we ask.)
To: GodBlessRonaldReagan
"I guess perjury isn't a crime..." Democrats, lying is merely a lifestyle choice...
171
posted on
06/03/2003 6:18:25 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
To: ChadGore
good post Chad!
172
posted on
06/03/2003 6:22:09 PM PDT
by
votelife
(FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-172 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson