Skip to comments.
Hillary Blasts "Activist" Supreme Court
Associated Press ^
| 7/24/02
| By ANNE GEARAN, Associated Press Writer
Posted on 07/24/2002 9:19:09 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
"In addition to installing an American president, the current Supreme Court has invalidated federal laws at the most astounding rate in our nation's history," Clinton said to applause and laughter.
ha, ha. I thought that line was the best.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
People better wake up to what is happening with Judge Owen, who is being Borked by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
2
posted on
07/24/2002 9:20:46 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: 11th Earl of Mar
"In addition to installing an American president, the current Supreme Court has invalidated federal laws at the most astounding rate in our nation's history," Clinton said to applause and laughter.But, Hillary, its for the children.
3
posted on
07/24/2002 9:21:59 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
To: 11th Earl of Mar
And just how activist would a Hilldebeast court be???
To: 11th Earl of Mar
"In addition to installing an American president, the current Supreme Court has invalidated federal laws at the most astounding rate in our nation's history," Clinton said to applause and laughter.Yep--she would have gotten the same reaction if she addressed the FRiva Las Vegas meeting. Do you think she would come if invited to give a speach against judicial activism?
5
posted on
07/24/2002 9:24:11 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: 11th Earl of Mar
"...even more disturbing than the court's impulse to defend state and local prerogatives..."No... what's disturbing is that she finds this disturbing...
To: 11th Earl of Mar
My hand is up,
Hillary, oh Hillary please pick me, please pick me
Hillary: "Yes sir"
Me: "Oh Queen, who picked all the supreme court justices since 1992??
Hillary: "Shut-up you FJB"
7
posted on
07/24/2002 9:28:39 AM PDT
by
aShepard
To: Corporate Law
When you knock an institution like the Supreme Court, you have to come up with a better system.
It would be contrary to what our forefathers established.
Tell us what the solution is Hillary??
Make them forefathers roll over in their graves!!
Sac
To: mwl1
I am waiting for one of these nominees to get some cajones and speak up and say: Senator I thoroughly agree with Roe/wade, but It should have been in effect at the turn of the century,therefore,there is a good possibilty that many of you compaining whimps would have been aborted and wouldn't be here to ask me such stupid questions.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
....."has invalidated federal laws at the most astounding rate in our nation's history," Clinton said to applause and laughter.So did she and her husband.
10
posted on
07/24/2002 9:29:05 AM PDT
by
stanz
To: 11th Earl of Mar
"In addition to installing an American president, the current Supreme Court has invalidated federal laws at the most astounding rate in our nation's history,"As well they should Hillary. It's not activism to try to RETURN to a previous level of the general government's power. I would fathom to guess that a good 70% of the federal laws passed in the last 130 or so years have no Constitutional basis whatsoever
States win the power struggle when they want to claim immunity from civil rights lawsuits or get tough on criminals, but not when they want to limit cigarette ads, help fund legal help for poor people, or "follow their own election laws
So states that actually want to follow the Constitution are bad and those powers should be held in check, but states that want to further your socialist agenda no matter what damage is done to the Constitution are good. Thanks for just coming right out in the open there Hillary. I can't talk much longer though. Her power grab partner Giddy Dolt will be in office soon and just like their husbands I imagine they'll just do everything together. Isn't that swell?!?!
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Earlier thread
here with lots of comments.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
How convenient of her not to mention (and the press not report) the USSC overturned the FLSC by a 7-2 vote. The remedy (to stop the recount) was 5-4. Hillary is an evil swine.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
but it stripped a state of power to administer its own laws Uh, Hillary? The "administration" of laws (enactment and enforcement) is conducted by the legislative and executive branches of the government. Not the judiciary. In the case of Bush v. Gore, SCOFLA was the body that "stripped" the powers of its coequals. SCOTUS rectified that.
14
posted on
07/24/2002 9:34:30 AM PDT
by
Mr. Bird
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Hillary Clinton is married to a RAPIST!
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Thank You New York.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
How droll that this pap should flow past the lips of the biggest political whore in history!
Hillary indeed.
This trailor-trash twit has all the trappings one finds wound about the neck of a hillbilly marxist traitor!
To: All
This is the same tactic she used when she was promoting her health care agenda.....
"You're all stupid"....I'll tell you what is right for you!!
Sac
To: Dixie Mom
You are exactly right. And furthermore: the judgment in Bush v. Gore dealt with the procedure for electing the electors, which is manifestly a federal matter. This matter is handed over to the several states to manage as each sees fit according to custom and technology, but the Supremes, rightly by 7-2 vote, determined that the Florida Rules were not proper.
Now, to exend that logic would mean that ALL Presidential Ballots must be consistent throughout the nation, but the Supremes in Dec. 2000 made it clear that their decision concerned only the current set of facts before them.
19
posted on
07/24/2002 9:38:55 AM PDT
by
Remole
To: 11th Earl of Mar
"Clinton, a Democrat from New York, criticized the court's recent trend of 5-4 cases that have favored state power over federal control." I guess the senator has never read the 10th Amendment. Too bad she feels the Constitution is unconstitutional. Thank God her husband did not appoint her to the Supreme Court! This woman is an imbecile!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson