Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Jeeves
If Morgan and Citi bet all this money that the price of gold would not go too high because they believed the market was rigged, who would take the other side of the bet? If the bet was one that could only be won if Morgan and Citi went down (and probably not even then,) why make the bet?
39 posted on 07/24/2002 9:05:07 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
who would take the other side of the bet?

Morgan and Citi were involved in the 'gold carry trade'. They leased gold from the Treasury at low interest rates (1% or so), sold it, and then invested the proceeds in gov't bonds. They made the spread and it added up to a lot. A nice business, as long as the price of gold doesn't rise. If goes up to much, they won't be able to cover their short positions, which are huge at this point (greater than the global annual production of gold) and the Treasury doesn't get their gold back.

52 posted on 07/24/2002 9:25:01 AM PDT by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson