Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smart Case, July 24, 2002
07/24/02 | Jolly Green

Posted on 07/23/2002 9:34:42 PM PDT by Jolly Green

Wild-Eyed Speculation, Half-baked Theories and Myths
Theory(?) Facts
Richard Ricci has been identified as the prime suspect in the case, though several of his "theme park" pals are under suspicion. - Ricci is a 5-time loser, having been convicted of burglarizing a food bank and shooting a police officer. He has recently been indicted on three additional state charges including theft at the Smart residence and burglary of a Smart neighbor. Additionally, he has been recently indicted on three federal charges related to two bank robberies.
- Ricci worked for the Smarts last year for several months and was paid with a white Jeep in lieu of cash. He had full access to the house and may very well have had a key to the Smart residence. Ricci and two others were fired when some items were stolen from the home. Ricci later approached Ed Smart and said he wasn't involved and wanted his job back. Ed Smart declined to rehire him.
- Ricci lives in a trailer park in West Jordan that is now referred to as a "theme park" because of the large number of Ricci convicted felon friends living there.
- Ricci has no credible alibi for the period during and shortly after the abduction. He is believed to have put an additional 1000 miles on the Jeep during a period when he claimed the Jeep was in Moul's shop. Moul also reported that Ricci removed several trash bags, the seat covers and a post hole digger and carried them across the street.
- Ricci had both opportunity and motive.
Ed Smart and Richard Ricci were gay lovers. This is based upon Ed Smart's pleading before the media for Ricci to come clean, where he used phrases like "Help me, Richard". This theory was eloquently refuted by Jengaio and it hasn't reared its ugly head recently.
Elizabeth Smart had a nose ring, must have been rebellious and ran away. Later, proponents shifted emphasis to "piercings". Numerous photographs of Elizabeth Smart show no indication of a nose ring and the existence of a nose ring has never been reported by any credible news source.
Moul, the mechanic, lied to the grand jury and in TV interviews. Some of the scenarios: He knows more than he is telling; his eyesight is bad; he made it up; he is in cahoots with Ricci; he used Ricci's Jeep without Ricci's permission. Moul has no criminal record and no motive. What's more his vehicle logs corroborate his testimony. If Moul had "borrowed" the Jeep, he certainly would have washed it to remove the bugs, mud and pine needles.
Elizabeth Smart's aunt, in a televised interview said the police "are working with us". Implications: This surely must mean that the Smarts and their influential friends and church must be controlling/thwarting the 100-man SLCPD/FBI task force We will ask Jengaio to analyze the phrazing.

Motive Possible Suspect Details
Kidnapping All - The SLCPD has said there has not been any credible ransom demands. This may be due to the massive search and media blitz within 5 hours of the abduction i.e. the perps may have realized that their chances of getting caught were very high and they decided to get rid of the evidence.
Ricci & cronies - Ricci and his colleagues have recently been indicted for several Utah bank robberies, each producing only a modest amount of cash i.e. $1800 split 3 ways. It is likely that they were looking for a bigger "score".
Unknown N/A
Burglary Ricci - Ricci has five previous convictions for theft, burglary, and assault (shooting a police officer). He has recently been indicted on three additional state charges including burglary of a Smart neigbor while they were sleeping (a M.O. similar to the Smart kidnapping) and theft of the Smart home. He has also been indicted on three federal charges including two bank robberies.
- The Smarts, like most people, wouldn't keep large amounts of cash around. It seems likely that a simple burglary would not produce much in the way of cash or jewelery.
- The SLCPD has said some things were taken but haven't identified those items.
Unknown N/A
Burglary Gone Wrong Ricci - The Smart perpetrator may have been surprised by Elizabeth Smart and decided to remove the only witness.
Unknown Same as above
Sexual Predator Ricci - Fox News reported Ricci had attempted an "inappropriate relationship" with one of his old girlfriends 16 yr old daughters.
Unknown N/A
Revenge Ricci - Ed Smart wouldn't rehire Ricci even though Ricci claimed he had no involvement in the theft of the Smart house.
Unknown N/A
Runaway Elizabeth Smart Unknown possible motive
Unknown N/A


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elizabethsmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: Palladin
Fox.....coming up right after commerical..
41 posted on 07/24/2002 12:49:32 PM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
no sketch....Tom said she wasn't welcomed!
42 posted on 07/24/2002 12:55:34 PM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
Just paraphrasing here, but Shep was ranting and waving his arms about the family claiming there was a sketch and the police saying they have no knowledge of a sketch......about the initial offers by Boylan being rejected by the family......just ranting about the "weirdness" of the contradictory info in the case. My interpretation was that he was primarily frustrated with the behavior of the Smart family. One thing I do remember Shep saying......Jeanne Boylan was supposed to have been appearing on FOX News at the time Shep was speaking, but he said that she hadn't showed up and they didn't know why.

BTW.....Shep is interviewing Marc Klass(sp?) right now......sounds like the Smart family is getting raked over the coals......
43 posted on 07/24/2002 12:56:39 PM PDT by freedox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: freedox
Marc Klaas....did the perp have a moustache....if not, they are holding the wrong man and a kidnapper is still out there...only MK knows!
44 posted on 07/24/2002 1:00:51 PM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: freedox
Omigosh! Did the Smart Bros. kidnap Jeanne Boylan?
45 posted on 07/24/2002 1:01:14 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: freedox
well....if Jeanne is under gag order than she can't come on the telly and talk...

do we know for a fact that she did interview MK?

46 posted on 07/24/2002 1:04:15 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: freedox
Thanks, fredox.

Maybe the P.D. gagged her. Who knows. It sounded like she was not able to answer questions about some things she observed with MK...in the interview. In my mind (not fact), I took it to mean she had been working with the police...but I don't know that, just my thinking at the time I heard her say it.

I am going to go in now and try to get it on paper.

47 posted on 07/24/2002 1:06:27 PM PDT by Neenah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Neenah
From what I gather on another board, Jeanne signed a confidentiality agreement with the Smarts. So this sketch session was more than likely suggested by the Smarts PR person, and not for police use. Evidently, the Smarts were looking bad on the sketch issue after the Samantha kidnapping and the quick results stemming from a 5 yo's description.

Boylan prob. had to cancel her appearance on Shep's show due to the agreement. No doubt she was reminded of the agreement by the Smarts' lawyers (who I'm sure don't exist--lawyers, what lawyers? Why would the Smarts need lawyers or PR people? That's only for parents who act suspiciously--right?)
49 posted on 07/24/2002 1:41:32 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: spore-gasm
Why would the GJ put a gag order on Boylan? All the other GJ witnesses--Angela R., Deana Newhouse, Thurber, Moul, etc.--have been flapping their lips all over to the media.
50 posted on 07/24/2002 1:45:42 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: spore-gasm
If there is anything exculpatory it's a problem for the police (i.e., no moustache)if they think they have 'their man.'

And we're supposed to believe that the family would give up the chance to get a sketch from one of the country's 'best' artists because of Klaas' association with Fox? What did that have to do with anything? Get the sketch out, find the perp and deal with Fox/Klaas later.

You answered your own question. The Smart family has relied totally on the SLCPD/FBI and if the police didn't want it published and feared Boylan/Klaas would leak it, not having Boylan do it was acceptable to the Smarts. For whatever reason, the police do not want a sketch published - that seems even more obvious now that Boylan has done a sketch and it hasn't been released - probably because they don't want it to be used later as a "get out of jail free" card.

51 posted on 07/24/2002 1:58:14 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Mary Katherine has been the most closely guarded asset in this whole investigation. Media has been allowed NO access to her, other than a single photograph of her and Elizabeth together. Reports are that police interviewers have only had access to her while in the presence of her mother. Now that Boylan has finally been allowed access, we find that the strict rules of secrecy continue. Whatever Mary Katherine brings to this investigation must be EXTREMELY SENSITIVE information......but sensitive for WHOM???
52 posted on 07/24/2002 2:07:17 PM PDT by freedox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Boylan prob. had to cancel her appearance on Shep's show due to the agreement. No doubt she was reminded of the agreement by the Smarts' lawyers (who I'm sure don't exist--lawyers, what lawyers? Why would the Smarts need lawyers or PR people? That's only for parents who act suspiciously--right?)

This thread has been pretty civil all day, but if you keep throwing out cheap shots at the Smart family, it probably won't stay that way. It is one thing to question their handling of the case, largely at the direction of the SLCPD/FBI. It is yet another to assume they are implicated and continually smear them.

It is becoming increasingly obvious that Ricci is involved in this up to his hairline and likely had one or more accomplices. The police apparently have known from the earliest days who the accomplice was and are trying to prove it. They probably view releasing a sketch of an accomplice as Elizabeth Smart's death warrant.

53 posted on 07/24/2002 2:09:41 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: Jolly Green
What exactly are you looking for documentation on? The dates covered by the immunity offer?
57 posted on 07/24/2002 2:30:32 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: spore-gasm
We've already established that a "loser" like Ricci would not be considered 'trusted' before, during or after his employment at the Smart home.

We have "established" no such thing. Ricci was in fact a trusted member of the community, working in the Smart's and neighbor homes unsupervised - UNTIL the theft. At which point he was no longer trusted.

58 posted on 07/24/2002 2:32:42 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
What exactly are you looking for documentation on? The dates covered by the immunity offer?

I'd like to see newspaper/news service stories on it. Thanks.

59 posted on 07/24/2002 2:33:42 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson