Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Ah, but I anticipated that, although my post was less than clear, I admit. By "space cannons", I meant "orbital space cannons". Here, I'm envisioning some sort of superconducting magnet/railgun sort of thing, of course.

The main drawback I see is similar to what you point out, though - the possibility that a Kennedy or Nadler might remain almost motionless, as the cannons shot off into deep space in the opposite direction...

74 posted on 07/24/2002 5:32:46 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
You need rockets, not cannons! The only problem is lashing a few Saturn Vs together.

Oh! We don't make Saturn Vs anymore? Never mind!

75 posted on 07/24/2002 5:34:40 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson