Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Space rock 'on collision course'
BBC ^ | 2002-07-23 | Dr David Whitehouse

Posted on 07/23/2002 7:00:00 PM PDT by Lorenb420

An asteroid discovered just weeks ago has become the most threatening object yet detected in space.

A preliminary orbit suggests that 2002 NT7 is on an impact course with Earth on 1 February 2019, although the uncertainties are large.

Astronomers have given the object a rating on the so-called Palermo technical scale of threat of 0.06, making NT7 the first object to be given a positive value.

From its brightness astronomers estimate it is about 2km wide, large enough to cause continent-wide devastation on Earth.

Although astronomers are saying the object definitely merits attention, they expect more observations to show it is not on an Earth-intersecting trajectory.

It was first seen on the night of 5 July, picked up by the Linear Observatory's automated sky survey programme in New Mexico, in the southern US.

Since then astronomers worldwide have been paying close attention to it, amassing almost 200 observations in a few weeks.

Dr Benny Peiser, of Liverpool John Moores University in the UK, told BBC News Online that "this asteroid has now become the most threatening object in the short history of asteroid detection".

NT7 circles the Sun every 837 days and travels in a tilted orbit from about the distance of Mars to just within the Earth's orbit.

Potential devastation

Detailed calculations of its orbit suggest many occasions when its projected path through space intersects the Earth's orbit.

Researchers estimate that on 1 February 2019 its impact velocity on the Earth would be 28km a second - enough to wipe out a continent and cause global climate changes.

However, Dr Peiser was keen to point out that future observations could change the situation.

He said: "This unique event should not diminish the fact that additional observations in coming weeks will almost certainly, we hope, eliminate the current threat."

Easily observable

According to astronomers NT7 will be easily observable for the next 18 months or so, meaning there is no risk of losing the object.

Observations made over that period - and the fact that NT7 is bright enough that it is bound to show up in old photographs - mean that astronomers will soon have a very precise orbit for the object.

Dr Donald Yeomans, of Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, told BBC News Online: "The orbit of this object is rather highly inclined to the Earth's orbit so it has been missed because until recently observers were not looking for such objects in that region of space."

Regarding the possibility of an impact, Dr Yeomans said the uncertainties were large.

"The error in our knowledge of where NT7 will be on 1 February 2019 is large, several tens of millions of kms," he said.

Dr Yeomans told BBC News Online that the world would have to get used to finding more objects like NT7 that, on discovery, look threatening, but then become harmless.

"This is because the problem of Near Earth Objects is now being properly addressed," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: astroids; crevolist; goliath; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: Scully
We haven't even solved the "three body problem" (in the general equation form), much less all of the perturbations that occur in the solar system as an object moves thru it. We can predict where this object will be with greater and greater accuracy as both the event time draws closer and we acquire more data points to predict from.
101 posted on 07/29/2002 8:30:07 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
A 2Km bolide will only wipe out 95% of our flora and fauna. Any thoughts on the next dominant species? I'm betting on the cockroach.
102 posted on 07/29/2002 9:59:06 PM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Nawwww, silicon (AI) :-)
103 posted on 07/29/2002 10:00:36 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Still gotta have someone around to plug 'em in. Nope, I'll stick with the cockroach. ;)
104 posted on 07/29/2002 10:02:36 PM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Nawww again. :-) Solar powered and self replicating :-)
105 posted on 07/29/2002 10:05:00 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
You keep hoping, don't you? ;) Ah, immortality! Have you figured out yet how to download your personality and memories?
106 posted on 07/29/2002 10:09:42 PM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Scully
LOL, you sure this isn't an AI talking to you now????
107 posted on 07/29/2002 10:11:36 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Ahem! You may recall I have some working knowledge of you. I would certainly know the difference. ;)
108 posted on 07/29/2002 10:13:51 PM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Scully
The cockroach will probably be abundant, but I don't see a lot of possibilities for world dominance -- at least no more than now, as they are numerous enough to already dominate the world. The same could be said of ants and even bacteria. Fecundity isn't the same as dominance. My bet would be on rodents.
109 posted on 07/30/2002 2:58:17 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Fecundity isn't the same as dominance

I agree in principal, but if you've noticed, the liberals seem to be attempting this tactic.

110 posted on 07/30/2002 5:42:05 AM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Scully
I agree in principal, but if you've noticed, the liberals seem to be attempting this tactic [fecundity = dominance].

Now you're talking about subsidized fecundity. Still, I don't see it. We breed cattle and catfish too. They're dependent, not dominant. Well, there's political dominance, but that's a different issue.

111 posted on 07/30/2002 7:14:10 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Any thoughts on the next dominant species? I'm betting on the cockroach.

I suspect after a great calamity, the next dominant species would be something even more parasitic than the cockroach ...... I'm thinking Congressional Democrats, or something similarly nasty and slimey.

112 posted on 07/30/2002 8:58:49 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Scully
You may recall I have some working knowledge of you.

Hey, knock it off; this is a family forum!

;-)

113 posted on 07/30/2002 9:00:33 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Well, I said the liberals are attempting this tactic. Works pretty well in the housing projects too, I might add. And they are a huge voting-block...which could qualify them as being dominant, I guess.
114 posted on 07/30/2002 7:49:05 PM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
I'm thinking Congressional Democrats, or something similarly nasty and slimey.,/p>

Can't think of anything nastier than a Congressional Democrat. Cockroaches can at least be admired for their adaptability.

115 posted on 07/30/2002 7:53:31 PM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson