Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TADSLOS
Col. Mike Hiemstra, the Center's director, said it would be "a legitimate conclusion" to assume that, had there been a battery of howitzers on the Anaconda battlefield, the guns could have shut down al-Qaida mortars that inflicted most of the roughly two-dozen U.S. casualties on the first day of battle.

I'm just a lowly civillian, but I figured this out too. Where the heck was our artillery? A few hits from even the most generic of our artillery could have blown those sand monkeys off the mountains, and at a cheaper cost than risking our tankbusting Apaches. This is not to say that I'm not proud of our troops - but some of their commanders need to get their head out into the fresh air.

2 posted on 07/23/2002 8:10:42 AM PDT by egarvue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: egarvue
For comments on lack of artillery and other lessons learned check the recent articles on the Miltech list!

Access at post #7.

8 posted on 07/23/2002 9:54:07 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: egarvue
The USAF has convinced Rumsfeld that field artillery is a thing of the past. Why use reliable and proven weapons platforms when you can use whiz-bang techno-gagdets?
13 posted on 07/23/2002 10:48:11 AM PDT by Seydlitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: egarvue
Bump for later reading
36 posted on 07/23/2002 6:14:23 PM PDT by chudogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson