Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BikerNYC
>>Rather, they are retained by individuals<<

It is correct that Nine protects the rights of individuals. But it is also correct that the Founders clearly contemplated "the People" as both singular and plural.

"The People", in their States, could establish churches, outlaw lewdness, forbid pornography, regulate intercourse between the races, all without violating Nine.

9 posted on 07/23/2002 7:45:00 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
If that's what they meant, they should have said that, and specifically stated that the States retain the right to regulate the rights of individuals not specifically mentioned in the Constitution.
12 posted on 07/23/2002 7:47:12 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
"The People", in their States, could establish churches, outlaw lewdness, forbid pornography, regulate intercourse between the races, all without violating Nine.

Maybe so, but I feel this basis is flawed. This "power" is in the same vain as considering blacks less than human and not allowing women to vote. How so? It is based upon humans just "making it up as they go along". The founders had some good ideas, but they were not really interested in a "free" country.

18 posted on 07/23/2002 7:52:51 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson