Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
You are not authorized to pick & choose which amendments states are required to obey.

Just as you are not authorized to pick and choose which sections of the Constitution you want to pay attention to. You keep harping on the "clear wording" of Article VI, but when someone points out the clear words of the first amendment - "Congress shall make no law..." - it just seems to go right over your head for some reason.

176 posted on 07/24/2002 12:08:05 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
You are not authorized to pick & choose which amendments states are required to obey.

Just as you are not authorized to pick and choose which sections of the Constitution you want to pay attention to.

Wanna bet? - I pay 'attention to' topics that interest me.

You keep harping on the "clear wording" of Article VI, but when someone points out the clear words of the first amendment - "Congress shall make no law..." - it just seems to go right over your head for some reason.

No one knows exactly why the wording 'Congress' was specified for only the first. -- The best explanation, imo, is that it was used to pacify those religious fanatics of the day that insisted on the allowing of existing colonial government religions in the new state constitutions. It was a political dodge, a compromise, used to ease ratification.
Sure enough, in the course of time liberty prevailed, and state religions were abandoned.
- Then, with the ratification of the 14th, the point became moot. It's clear intent was that all states were required to comply with all of the BoR's.

177 posted on 07/24/2002 3:53:38 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson