Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
If you don't mind, post or email me your new spreadsheet. I don't quite follow why Republicans will be hurt more in Yankee, upscale districts than culturally conservative ones. My thinking is that as the economy becomes a bigger concern, this gives Democrats an opportunity to win in rural areas on economics instead of losing on cultural issues.

Maybe NJ-05. I'm nervous about that one anyway. Maybe Wilson in NM? Doubtful. The only race I would currently say has changed from slight Rep. fav. to slight Dem. fav. because of all of this, is NH-01.

62 posted on 07/24/2002 10:26:36 PM PDT by crasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: crasher
Folks in Little Dixie don't own stocks. Those folks won't react unless their jobs are impacted, not their portfolios. I haven't updated my spreedsheet much. I am still pondering. NJ-5 is a good choice, but the place voted for Schundler. I consider Schundler voters to be pretty hard core. They are the true believers. They will blame their portfolio problems all on Clinton. Maybe Ferguson.
63 posted on 07/24/2002 10:33:11 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson