You don't think its odd that there are two cases of bug guys that put the time of death of a body in the desert about 10 days earlier than all the other evidence ? I do.
You don't think its odd that there are two cases of bug guys that put the time of death of a body in the desert about 10 days earlier than all the other evidence ? I do.
Which other evidence have you seen in the trial thus far that is completely at odds with the findings of the bug guys? Other than the fact that the SDPD was watching DW 24x7 during the time period the bug guys say that Danielle's body was dumped?
(And, BTW, do we know the whereabouts of DVD during this time period? Just wondering...).
FRegards,
PrairieDawg
Actually, I don't consider myself enough of a 'bug expert' to judge the actual validity of one expert vs. another.
I think you can have 1 guy testify PRO and one CON and it means nothing. Experts can be found in every field to say what ONE SIDE wants.
The only way I can 'judge' the information/expert opinion of the forensic entomologists, is by OBSERVATION of CIRCUMSTANCE.
By this I mean that the Prosecution hired the 1st BUGMAN to investigate. When his conclusions did not support the prosecution's contentions the prosecution refused to put him on the stand, even though the 1st BUGMAN has been repeatedly used and trusted by the PROSECUTION.
It's like a BIG NEON SIGN over FAULKNER'S HEAD saying THIS GUY IS TELLING THE TRUTH!
Now the prosecution is trying to bring in a guy from Hawaii (sir, do you speak English / No......Well, that will work!)in an attempt to find someone unfamiliar with the environment so he can come to a different conclusion that will support the "STORY" the prosecution has been trying to SELL. How much more obvious does it have to get ?
Would the prosecution have to hire a bug expert from PLUTO to get people to see the TRUTH?
Tell me, if you would, what the statistical probabilities that a bug expert from an ISLAND with a TROPICAL environment and different species and varieties of insects would give a more ACCURATE rending of the investigation than a LOCALLY BASED EXPERT that was ON SCENE with the BODY and did his investigation?
BTW, You seem to be doing a good job sticking to your guns and defending yourself, and making others think and prove what they say. I always admire that, no matter what 'side' you think you are on. :)
Sometimes we all get to involved, so heated, so wrapped up and tense about this case that a little humor helps break the tension.