One camp states definitively that DW DID it, and the trial is a waste of time. They want DW hung right away, no questions asked. No matter what has happened in the trial, they are still convinced he is guilty and would hang him if they could get near him.
They do not want to wait for the trial to finish to make up their minds.
The other camp states that DW is NOT GUILTY and they have made up their minds. They don't need need to wait for the trial to end either. They have seen enough to come to a conclusion. Both sides are very stubborn and hard-headed about this.
The next 2 camps are kinda one camp. Those that either thought DW did it at first, or thought maybe he didn't , but now having gone through most of the trial, have come to a fairly well informed conclusion.
Of course, then, there is that tiny little camp, way outside of town, that has the few people in it that Didn't know at first whether DW did it, and are waiting until the trial is concluded to finish coming to a conclusion. (wish I was one of them)
ANYWAY, the one camp we all belong to (regardless to what emotion gets people to say) is the camp where we want the REAL KILLER arrested, tried, and if guilty, HUNG BY HIS JEWELS.
Finally, I think you can tell from reading the posts, just who is in what camp. Just asking a poster which camp they are in will usually not get you the REAL answer. Observation is best.
But I always have an opinion (which is subject to change). An opinion is different than "making up my mind" which I have been accused of but isn't true. My current opinion is that he is guilty based on the physical evidence in the RV. Most of the other crap about how he got in the house etc are all distractions. However, I need an explanation entered in evidence that at least gives some credible reason for the bug guys being wrong.
Without that if I were a juror I would make it a hung jury. No way could I say he wasn't guilty. I would essentially vote for a do-over so the prosecution could back fill the holes in the time of death.