Add to that two other unlikely events and the explanation she played there strains reason.
Many of us posting here have shared various experiences we have had as 7 Y.O. children (or so), that included playing in neighbor's boats, trailers, garages and even cars. Others, have shared experiences, they have had with neighbor children playing in their RV's. So frankly, minion, it's difficult, for me, to understand why it "strains reason" in your particular case.
As for your implication that someone tried to remove Danielle's hair from the MH, that IMO, does tend to strain reason. There was hair, of all types, found throughout the MH and much of it was varying shades of blond. If you can explain how you hypothesize, that DW selectively found, identified and disposed of only Danielle's hair, I would be very interested in hearing your theory.
My kids would have left more than two prints in one spot. The likelihood that my kid leaves a few hairs is probable but that one of them ends up in a sink trap is next to nil assuming he was only there a short time. Add to that the odd's my kid was bleeding at the same time all add up to straining the possibilites.
Finally the lack of testimony that even one kid played there is very troubling. As for your implication that someone tried to remove Danielle's hair from the MH, that IMO, does tend to strain reason. There was hair, of all types, found throughout the MH and much of it was varying shades of blond.
If you can explain how you hypothesize, that DW selectively found, identified and disposed of only Danielle's hair, I would be very interested in hearing your theory.
He didn't Danielles hair was there.