Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theirjustdue
Lacking specifics, I don't think anyone can make an accurate prediction of what her lose would have been. JMO.

Not trying to make an accurate prediction. just trying to see if the explanation by the defense makes any sense. The fact that there is a hair at all plus the lack of fingerprints plus the presence of blood or two blood like substance's all of which individually are not likely and in total are almost impossible.

Look at it this way. Its like a trifecta at a horse race where all three winning horses had the slowest prior records.

839 posted on 07/23/2002 7:07:48 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Recommended reading Jeffrey Graham's testimony on 6/20 and 7/10. Transcripts are on the UT site. He explains about leaving latent prints. It's not as easy as people think and certainly not as easy as it looks on cop shows.
843 posted on 07/23/2002 7:19:36 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson