[dread78645]

> IF Danielle would have been in the MH between 02/01/02 and 02/03/02, the dogs should have detected that. They didn't

This was part of testimony ? An expert opined this ? What exactly did he say because I am surprised anyone would claim to prove a negative.

If the dogs could find a body, alive or dead, why would you use dogs (or testify about using them) ?

My plecostomus didn't detect Danielle's body, and I wasn't called to testify ...

[VRWC_minion]

If the dogs could find a body, alive or dead, why would you use dogs (or testify about using them) ?

In my line of work a positive confirmation is proof while a negative confirmation means nothing.