[cyncooper]

Once again you are spreading a lie.

Well, I certainly am not. That is mighty strong language and I posted the testimony on a thread the other day.

Dulaney made a note when cataloging evidence that the fiber appeared dull. It came out in testimony that since the fiber was in the hair in the dirt it was deceptive to the naked eye.

As further testimony revealed, testing found it was similar in every way (including color).

I am not a liar.

[UCANSEE2]

geez. What difference does it make. So Danielle had a fiber stuck in the choker, obviously been STUCK there as it was WOUND AROUND SOME HAIR, or something. Usually means there is a REASON it got STUCK. Like getting wet, and then getting hot (blow dryer) or hair being brushed. Probably stuck there ever since Danielle was at DW's running all over the house.

Brenda said the 'well behaved' children stayed by her side except for checking out the pool.

DW, before he was arrested, stated to police that the KIDS were ALL OVER THE HOUSE, UPSTAIRS,DOWNSTAIRS, THE BEDROOM,GARAGE,POOL.

DW's story stayed the same, Brenda's stories have changed more times than I can count on my fingers.

The police/Prosecution is using it to try and prove something, mainly because it shows just HOW LITTLE THEY HAVE. They know they can't prove WHEN it got stuck in her choker. They know that means it doesn't prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. BUT IT IS ONE OF THE EW THINGS THEY HAVE. Drowning victims will grab at anything in a panic.