[VRWC_minion]

I would ask you what your point is, but you have made that apparent, all that you want is to bait people - why not read the transcripts and start following the case like the rest of us?

I am not baiting but I am accepting new information. So far the idea that the physical evidence got in the RV by playing there isn't credible to me. It defies probabilities and logic.

[crypt2k]

So far the idea that the physical evidence got in the RV by playing there isn't credible to me. It defies probabilities and logic.

The same is true of the lack of DW evidence in the VD home. That is why I favor a theory that Danielle was outside the house, for some reason.

That doesn't clear DW, (who could have seen her wandering about and picked her up offering to search for her missing father) or an Avila-type happened by at the right moment.

[UCANSEE2]

So far the idea that the physical evidence got in the RV by playing there isn't credible to me. It defies probabilities and logic.

YEP. Just because you find something NOT CREDIBLE does not keep it from being existant.

Explain how all the crop circles all over the world got there, using your probabilities and logic.