Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yeti
He has no reasonable basis in the whole wide world to arrive at those numbers

Correct. Insert your own probality, your answer will be very low.

or to assume that they can be multiplied to arrive at an overall probability.,

Probality theory.

382 posted on 07/22/2002 6:49:08 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
"Probality theory" Did you write the book on it?
385 posted on 07/22/2002 6:50:50 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
Probality theory.

  A very bad application of probability theory at that. We know that a single hair of Danielle's was found in the sink trap of the motor home. We know there are multiple ways it could have gotten there, simply because we are able to imagine multiple ways, and don't actually know the answer. The sum of the probabilities of all the ways it could have gotten there must be equal to 1.

  This, then is the calculation that you're really interested in - not some single path theory. It's a much more difficult problem (in fact, it's not solvable, since you must assign a probability to the paths you have not thought of). But then, that's why we don't put probability evidence in a courtroom, and why it's not taken too seriously on these boards.

Drew Garrett

403 posted on 07/22/2002 6:59:42 PM PDT by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
"Probality" that DW could have have dumped Danielle at Dehesa between Feb 12 and 21st, undetected=0%.

"Probality" that Damon could have dumped Danielle at Dehesa on his week end trip of Feb 16th, undetected=98.873%.

"Probality" that Damon knew where Danielle's body was when he said to the Press on Feb 18th, that the searchers should be looking closer to SD=100%.
418 posted on 07/22/2002 7:10:25 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
Probality theory.

According to probability theory, this planet doesn't exist.

496 posted on 07/22/2002 8:11:39 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion; All; ~Kim4VRWC's~
Probality theory.

Makin' it up, makin' it up.

The events described are not card draws. I think your scenario might be a Bays' Theorem problem.

But really it's a quantum probability issue, what with all the spin I detect on it.

813 posted on 07/23/2002 2:28:25 AM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson