Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Question for those that have been watching the trial.

A woman that my wife works with said that when she was watching the trial there was evidence that his DNA was found on her neckless. Is that true or false?

If there was his DNA on her neckless his goose is cooked!

372 posted on 07/22/2002 6:42:14 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: dalereed
Grossly false.
376 posted on 07/22/2002 6:43:31 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

To: dalereed
...that his DNA was found on her neckless

Not true. There was no DW DNA found anywhere on Danielle. No hairs, no skin under her fingernails.
377 posted on 07/22/2002 6:45:32 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

To: dalereed
An orange fiber in Danielles necklace is similar to those all over Westerfields house.
389 posted on 07/22/2002 6:52:04 PM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

To: dalereed
If there was his DNA on her neckless his goose is cooked!

FALSE.

490 posted on 07/22/2002 8:09:58 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson