[John Jamieson]

Because the prosecution has not presented that theory as they must in cases involving more than one person. I don't think Dusek is allowed to change he's theory from what he presented in his opening statement that DW was the sole perpetrator.

[NatureGirl]

Hi, John. I was actually surprised by the Prosecution on this. They hired Faulkner, he gave them the approx. date of Feb. 16th - why didn't they (and LE) start digging up some credible theory/evidence on DW having an accomplice? Or at least throw some "hints" to that effect out to the jury when they had the chance?