Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"I WASN'T SURE" is useless testimony.
335 posted on 07/22/2002 6:21:10 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]


To: John Jamieson
not sure about useless when the supervisor saw it. I agree..and if the supervisor hadn't saw the original alert..it would have looked worse than it already was.
343 posted on 07/22/2002 6:23:40 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson

Egads!@!!!  Has Nancy DisGrace seen this CourtTV headline???

Second entomologist bolsters defense

Photo
Neal Haskell said bug evidence indicates Danielle van Dam was dumped later than prosecutors' contend.

A second forensic expert testified Monday that insect evidence indicates murder defendant David Westerfield was already under police surveillance when someone dumped Danielle van Dam's body along a San Diego roadside.

The expert, Indiana forensic entomologist Neal Haskell, testified that the age of the flies and maggots found on the 7-year-old's body indicate that the girl was likely left along the highway between Feb. 12 and Feb. 21.

Van Dam was kidnapped from her bedroom the night of Feb. 1 and police began constantly monitoring Westerfield, her 50-year-old neighbor, four days later.

 

Danielle van Dam

The conclusions of the two entomologists are the defense's strongest evidence for Westerfield's innocence. Defense lawyer Steven Feldman told jurors during opening statements that "science" would rescue Westerfield by proving it was not physically possible for him to be at the site at the precise time her body was dumped.

Haskell was the second witness for the defense to testify that forensic evidence showed Danielle's body was dumped after police put Westerfield under surveillance. Entomologist David Faulkner testified earlier in the defense case that infestation likely occurred between Feb. 16 and Feb. 18.

"He had a narrower time frame than me," Haskell said when pressed on the disparity by prosecutor Jeff Dusek. "I was being more conservative."

Infestation can occur as soon as 20 minutes after death, but could take longer depending on the climate and whether the body has been covered, experts say.

Prosecutors, who have amassed a pile of other forensic evidence linking Westerfield to the kidnapping and murder, are taking the entomological challenge to their case very seriously. They have hired at least one insect expert, M. Lee Goff of Hawaii, to reanalyze the evidence.

In his cross-examination, Dusek suggested Haskell did not take into consideration the strange weather in San Diego in February when making his calculations. Faulkner testified that hot, dry and windy conditions reduced the fly population to the lowest levels ever noted, but said flies were still present. Haskell largely downplayed the abnormal climate, saying the insect life recovered from the body proved flies were still abundant at the scene.

At one point, Dusek asked Haskell if he had considered whether Danielle's dead body might have become mummified while driven around hot desert areas in Westerfield's recreational vehicle for a day and a half before being dumped along the road. Haskell admitted that the body might mummify slightly in such a scenario, but "not to the extent that it would inhibit the blowflies."

Before testimony began, Judge William Mudd warned jurors that the abduction and slaying of 5-year-old Samantha Runnion in Orange County had nothing to do with the case they were hearing.

"Other matters in other locations are of no relevance to the case," said Mudd.

 

345 posted on 07/22/2002 6:26:03 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson