You are the one with problems. If you have a problem with Poohbah why don't you get off the threads. Who the heck are you to not allow a different opinion? What do you have a DW shrine in your house or something? All I want is the guilty party, whoever that may be convicted and punished. This insect stuff considering it is only a guesstimate is interesting but not that accurate. The only thing important here that you said, is this
That is all any of us want. We want the jury to consider all the evidence and come to a FAIR and JUST conclusion based on PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
If the INSECT STUFF is not that accurate, why did DUSEK hire FAULKNER to begin with? Why has DUSEK used FAULKNER repeatedly in other trials to win cases ?
Before the trial went on recess for 11 days, the CTV reporter commented that the jury was paying close attention and taking notes during Faulkner's testimony. Did anyone else hear her say that?