[Travis McGee]

The point about the Rick Roberts Show in-court reporter "Little River" (as he calls her) is that she has a front row seat and is able to watch the second by second JUROR REACTION to what is said between the lawyers and witnesses.

She is saying that the JUROR REACTION to the bug witnesses was very skeptical.

Unless you are a blowfly on the courtroom wall, you have not seen even one JUROR REACTION, have you?

[Freedom2specul8]

"She is saying that the JUROR REACTION to the bug witnesses was very skeptical. "

Trav, Were you listening? Did she explain what they were doing to give her that impression? Did it get worse after dusek pointed out his fees? I am curious if dusek picked up on that too...and maybe that's why he rubbed in it with per hour charges testimony.

[Freedom2specul8]

"and maybe that's why he rubbed it in with per hour charges testimony. "

[Jaded]

Little River's opinion is the same as Rick Roberts'.

[UCANSEE2]

She is saying that the JUROR REACTION to the bug witnesses was very skeptical.

And you totally trust her interpretation of the LOOKS on their faces, that she can INTUIT what they are thinking

That she has absolutely no reason to be biased, or taint her description to what she thinks best will make the AUDIENCE watch her show? To keep her job?

Is this true ?

[cyncooper]

Unless you are a blowfly on the courtroom wall, you have not seen even one JUROR REACTION, have you?

Thanks Travis. That is why I thought it interesting, if nothing else. I will look forward to what the jury has to say after it is over, if any of them care to speak publicly about the trial.