Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rheo
How do you explain the other blonde hairs in the sink drain that were not Danielle's?

Why is there a need to explain it ? The only relevant hairs are Danielles ?

241 posted on 07/22/2002 5:28:46 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
You stated

The presence of the hair in the trap. The likelihood that a hair would have shed, plus found its way in the drain, plus got caught and not washed down is slim to none in my opinion.

Someone elses hair was shed and caught and not washed down, why is it hard to believe hers wasn't?

246 posted on 07/22/2002 5:31:33 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
"Why is there a need to explain it ? The only relevant hairs are Danielles ?"

Silly questions/statements. Hair in the MH from any of the swinging sextet would bust this case wide open.
272 posted on 07/22/2002 5:45:41 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
Why is there a need to explain it ? The only relevant hairs are Danielles ?

That was sarcasm, right? If not, I guess I can see how you developed your opinion. :)

The only hairs relevant are Danielle's,
The only (hairs,fibers,prints,etc) relevant are Westerfield's.

Just ignore those other hairs,fibers,prints you found. They don't mean anything.

Thank you for your co-operation
(signed, the real killer)

414 posted on 07/22/2002 7:07:54 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson