Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
No blood. Just trace of DNA of unknown origin.

Neither I, nor anyone else I see posting here, is a "Westerfield fan." I am a "reasonable doubt" fan. If the r.d. were one-fourth what there is in this case, an acquittal would be required.

My own view is that there is a 20% chance that DW did something seriously wrong or illegal, but that several other persons are also in that range or higher, including Damon-- and a possible abducting stranger who took Danielle from the little park near her home, or en route to or from it, on Friday afternoon.

DW certainly did NOT dispose of the body, so perhaps it would be best to start at Feb 16 with the body disposal, and work BACK!

All the best, crys.

183 posted on 07/22/2002 4:55:28 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: crystalk
My own view is that there is a 20% chance that DW did something seriously wrong or illegal, but that several other persons are also in that range or higher, including Damon-- and a possible abducting stranger who took Danielle from the little park near her home, or en route to or from it, on Friday afternoon.

If so, how do you explain the physical evidence in the RV and on Danielle ?

DW certainly did NOT dispose of the body, so perhaps it would be best to start at Feb 16 with the body disposal, and work BACK!

Why so certain the expert is correct ?

192 posted on 07/22/2002 5:01:18 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson