[EllaMinnow]

This all started when I asked another poster why he changed formerdem's name to currentdem in his reply. He (or she) hasn't replied to my question, but you have - and I appreciate it. Could you please answer this one last question for me -

Do you think that a person can believe that the prosecution has proven their case, and still be a conservative, a Christian, and a Republican?

[John Jamieson]

Sure! So long as you're really informed. None of us has the view and concentration of the jury members, but we have the ability to discuss the testimony much more.

[John Jamieson]

My big problem, is people that get their FACTS from news bytes, no matter what their politics are.

[UCANSEE2]

Red..., the remark is (if I may speak for others) a joke, a reference to the idea that in general DEMOCRATS are hard-headed, can't see the forest for the trees, gun-grabbing, welfare soaking, whiners that want to throw away the constitution and our system of JUSTICE and HANG DW (or any other perp) without DUE PROCESS OF LAW.

Now, I am sure Democrats have their version of the way they see Republicans.

You are on a 'REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE' website and so a reference like this is pretty much obvious and easy to make you when go back and read that POST.

[dread78645]

Do you think that a person can believe that the prosecution has proven their case, and still be a conservative, a Christian, and a Republican?

Certainly. But I have the opposing belief that Westerfield did not murder the child.

My alteration of the name was a poke at the people that watch lame-stream media and think they know what has happened.

'course, I'm sure formerDem will show-up and provide the reasoning behind his/her declarations. Right ?