To: Southflanknorthpawsis; VRWC_minion
This is what I got out of what I've heard about Goff regrding this case....Goff has been sent stuff about the case, the evidence I'm assuming - could be the testimonies of the other experts though - or both - anyway - he is not saying much - cuz he thinks it's better that way - in case he's called to testify. It's not for sure that he will testify. I think it will be telling if he does not testify after having been consulted.
To: mommya
I think it will be telling if he does not testify after having been consulted.I agree.
It will also be interesting if he does testify to see Dusek contradict his own attitude toward Haskell for examining Faulkner's work.
It seems like Goff will have even less independent areas from which to draw.
To: mommya
Yes. But has he studied California flies???
1,541 posted on
07/23/2002 9:26:50 PM PDT by
Krodg
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson