Now I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but no way I could have gotten this:
No. It was insinuated that this guy's opinion was incontestable because of his reputation. That is a false conclusion which can be best shown by the recent example of an a top five accounting firm's actions. The man's opinion comes from his being expert but its still potentialy wrong or based on mistaken data.
out of the above post
Thankfully, science is a great deal different than the profession of accounting. No one said that The Bug Guy's testimony was "Incontestable"(at least I don't think so) I was just agreeing with the poster that this guy really knows his bugs.
As a CPA that has served as an expert witness. Accounting isn't a great deal differenmt than what this bug guy is doing. In fact they are very similar.