Anyone who thinks Westerfield did not kidnap, rape, and murder Danielle Van Dam is:
a) an idiot
b) a former o.j. juror
c) a child molester or child molester sympathizer
d) a contrarian (taking an opposing view for the sake of taking an opposing view)
e) a person who thinks someone with a college education, a home, and a good-paying job wouldn't commit a crime like this because 'they have too much to lose'
f) johnnie cochran
g) a member of some defense lawyer organization
h)someone who thinks Mark Furhman planted the blood on Westerfield's jacket
i) someone who likes to view child pornography
j) any or all of the above.
Oh, yeah. Any defense lawyer reading the 'pro-westerfield' posts is laughing his/her a** off at your attempts to explain why he couldn't have done it. Defense lawyers have done a good job convincing people that ANY doubt is a reasonable doubt...and, hey.....any doubt that you (such a smart person..coming up with all those explanations for the evidence)..any doubt YOU have just MUST be reasonable. Yeah. You can be a big hero and be the holdout on the jury.
Circumstances are also evidence. You will rarely, if ever, be convinced of something 100 per cent. It takes courage to convict beyond a REASONABLE doubt, and NO COURAGE to find all sort of REASONS (reasonable or NOT) to explain away something.
I'm not looking for replies. Just had to get that off my chest. I have a low moron-tolerance right now.
You have misdiagnosed yourself. More likely you have been watching too much Court TV.
Really? Please don't do anything rash. You'll like your moronic self more tomorrow.
You forgot Nazi, mysogynist and homophobe.