Replies

In # 825 you stated: "The fact that only one hair was found implies to me that many more hairs were initially present which either got vaccumed up, picked up or sent out as gray/black water. It also implies that someone attempted to remove them."

In #927, I responded: " As for your implication that someone tried to remove Danielle's hair from the MH, that IMO, does tend to strain reason. There was hair, of all types, found throughout the MH and much of it was varying shades of blond".

And then in #934, you stated "He didn't Danielles hair was there."

Now, either you are contradicting yourself, misunderstood my response, or I'm just not seeing your point. In any case, I'm having difficulty making sense what you are trying to communicate here.

As to your #934 comment: "My kids would have left more than two prints in one spot.

I'm not sure what you are implying, in this case, either. If it's as some have suggested, that DW wiped the MH of prints, that, IMO, has been pretty well disproved by court testimony. There were many other prints in the MH and DW could not have selectively wiped only Danielle's prints away (except for the one). Also, consider that none of the "pizza gang" left a single clear print at the VD's, after their little pizza party, showing that usable prints are not always left at a scene. If it's something else you had in mind, please give me more information to go on. TIA

And then in #934, you stated "He didn't Danielles hair was there."
Now, either you are contradicting yourself, misunderstood my response, or I'm just not seeing your point. In any case, I'm having difficulty making sense what you are trying to communicate here.
I understand your post. You are saying that if Westerfield attempted to remove the hairs he wouldn't have missed all the others. Yor assumption presupposes that a cleaning would eliminate all hair. I disagree. A cleaning could occur and would not be likely to eliminate all hair but could eliminate most hair. I don't even think an auto detailer is that good.

If it was cleaned then hair would be removed and it could be assumed that if any is left there was probably more of the same type of hair befoe cleaning.

I'm not sure what you are implying, in this case, either. If it's as some have suggested, that DW wiped the MH of prints, that, IMO, has been pretty well disproved by court testimony. There were many other prints in the MH and DW could not have selectively wiped only Danielle's prints away (except for the one).

The fact that there are so many other prints and only one print by Danielle makes it harder for me to accept she played there. Especially playing there long enough to loose several hairs and some blood.