Skip to comments.
2nd Bug Expert Bolsters Westerfield Defense: (Dusek Melting Down Before Juries Eyes!!)
NBC/San Diego ^
| July 22, 2002
| NBC/San Diego
Posted on 07/22/2002 3:02:31 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,621-1,635 next last
To: Greg Weston
I'm not impressed with your dodging of the question. Afraid it makes DW look bad that he didn't mention the "dirty dancing" with Brenda when asked directly who he danced with?I'm not trying to dodge it, when "fast dancing" he may have turned around and "faced her"...is that dancing, he may not of thought so, but the Cherokee's mom thought so
761
posted on
07/22/2002 10:43:48 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
WHAT is your problem? People SLEEP and CHANGE in a motor home. So what? That has NO bearing on ANYTHING.
To: Politicalmom
How convienent. Maybe if Westerfield has enough guts he'll get on the stand and straighten it all out then.
To: Greg Weston
>>>Westerfield said absolutely nothing about dancing with Brenda<<<And why would he do that when asked who he danced with?
Maybe its because the little, littlest one (Denise)made more of an impression on him and that is who he remembered right off.
764
posted on
07/22/2002 10:46:41 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: Politicalmom
Isn't that Redden interview transcript about 45 minutes long?...wasn't he interviewed for about 22 hours?
765
posted on
07/22/2002 10:47:45 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, you and I have always had a pleasant exchange of thoughts throughout these threads...I appreciate your candor.
My question to you is this: What about the bug evidence???
766
posted on
07/22/2002 10:48:16 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: demsux
>>>he may have turned around and "faced her"...<<<
And that's when the fibers flew through the air on him?
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Sorry only speak Italian 2 nd grade ,important do not respond I repeat ,do not respond
768
posted on
07/22/2002 10:50:02 PM PDT
by
fatima
To: Greg Weston
Alright, I'm done...take your prozac and see ya on some future thread.
769
posted on
07/22/2002 10:50:25 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: demsux
And leave me hanging about the flying fibers? How dare you!!
To: Jaded
This case is NOT about OJ. This is nothing like OJ. Why do so many of you insist on spewing the "Like OJ" line?Cuz the case is like OJ? :)
To: Greg Weston
Well since Barb & Brenda & densie were such good friends, it seems very posible they could have transferred from them to DW. Or maybe DW did dirty dance with Brenda and didn't get a chance to say it or didn't remember it. Much ado about nothing. Find something with some substance to squak about.
To: Spunky
Well like I said maybe he'll get on the stand and explain the whole fiber flying dirty dancing episode.
To: Greg Weston
Why would he get on the stand? Most defense attorneys counsel their clients not to, and in this case there already appears to be much doubt to those that have closely followed in and not just read the media Cliff notes...
To: VRWC_minion
That is a false conclusion which can be best shown by the recent example of an a top five accounting firm's actions. I missed some of transcripts, I guess.
Please post any links to accounting firms that murder 7 year old kinder. Thanks.
To: demsux
Thank you, thank you, thank you!!! Finally, someone asks about the testimony today. Evidently, it wasn't what a lot of posters on this thread today wanted discussed. I think it was very important, especially since todays witness backs up the witness that the DA was going to use.
776
posted on
07/22/2002 11:01:19 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
To: rolling_stone
Then let's talk about DW being the unfortunate victim of numerous unlucky coincidences. In your opinion is he the most unlucky murder defendent in history to have all this evidence both physical and circumstantial point right at him??
To: demsux; All
second attempt to post with edit. SIGH
Scratch my second post about blonde hair in the wheel well, it may mean nothing-I can't get back into the transcripts to make my point..so will try tomorrow!
Am having computer time outs...TOOK FOREVER TO GET THIS POSTED.
Sorry
To: Rheo
I'm now wondering how clumps of her hair could have gotten 15- 80- 90 feet from her body.
From what I understood, North of her body was the direction of a golf course. I believe her head under the tree was S so her feet were pointing North. Her body on a 6'slope is that right?? To the North is there some kind of ridge then a stream then a golf green is that right???>?
If the area is situated way then someone could have drug her body from the golf green, while stepping on her hair, that would have pulled clumps her hair out, and left a trail.
779
posted on
07/22/2002 11:07:32 PM PDT
by
juzcuz
To: Henrietta
See
IN RE GRIFFITHS, 413 U.S. 717 (1973) for the USSC case that states that attorneys are not officers of the court in the same sense that most people wrongly think. Scroll down to 413 U.S. 717, 728 for the most applicable part of this opinion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,621-1,635 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson