Posted on 07/22/2002 3:02:31 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Well, I think we ALL would like to see that. IIRC, it is not in evidence. SOmeone tell me I am wrong.
So much trash, in fact, that the FIRE DEPARTMENT had to come out to clean up the mess.
Make that Child Porn...if I had been in charge..fingerprints WOULD have been taken FIRST THING on the CD's.
"There are some weird coincidences going on that need to be researched. I and others are doing so. The linking info was pulled from the public. But not quick enough for FR posters. "
Please explain more!
But it would not have been so pure, I don't think.
One booger out of her nose, one tiny scab off a scratch on her knee...
So, IS that a nomination?
That is the experts point, which I disagree with. Its circular logic. It assumes the only way flies get to a body is on their own.
If flies don't normally leave the nice green golf course where food is plentiful to go searching off in the desert where food is not plentiful maybe the body in the desert gets its fair share of flies from the animals.
Because VRWC_minion has an idea that flies are different in "the barren desert", whatever that means.
It would screw the theory if :
A. flies are the same all over.
B. El Cajon is not desert.
According to the canadian site on this, the fly production varies according to the weather so much that there are times when the fly data are not valid. If its true in one extreme environment why assume that its not true in another extreme environment.
Isn't it possible there are times in the desert when fly's are not so bountiful as to create an accurate time frame ? To the canadian expert the obvious answer is yes. TO the american expert the obvisous answer is no. To me the rational answer is given by the canadian expert.
If anything or anybody shits in the open in a desert, a fly lands within 10 min, if not 10 sec, let me tell you. Trash, including fast food and ice cream containers, littered this area.
Would somebody who lives in one of the three driest major cities in the USA, Las Vegas, Albuquerque, and El Paso, please step in and tell this poster the truth about flies!
San Diego is much damper and more temperate.
down a steep minor ridge into the soft, sandy streambed of Sheep Canyon."
No - I didn't miss that - just wasn't sure whether it was a wet streambed or a dry one - have since learned that it could be either - depending on when one is there. So water is what the flies are atracted to? Did you know there was water - a resevoir I think (Sweetwater maybe) - on the opposite side of the road from where Danielle was found? OK OK - I know you're gonna say - with all that water over there - why would the flies travel over to Danielle's body? Well apparantly they traveled from the water in the streambed over to the hiker guy who wasn't even dead.
But did they get there of their own accord or did they hitch a ride ?
Visit here for some ideas on insect flight (impressive!). However, I also found this which measured sheep blowflies Lucilia sericata as only travelling 135 to 183m during a day.
All that said, I can't show one way or another whether or not the larvae came in on animals or the flies flew in. I did see in the sheep blowfly study that populations of 6 female blowflies/hectacre were observed - could the blowflies have been munching on something else in the area (something within 500 ft or so)before flying to Danielle's body?
Guess we'll have to wait on more info from the experts. Sorry I couldn't clear this up more.
FRegards,
PrairieDawg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.