Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
You're talking about this far west thing. And to date, you have ignored it entirely, mostly due to the fact that it was an embarrassing and thorough defeat for the yankees.

I'd say holding Nashville was more important.

In strategy to that part of the war, yes. Regardless you cannot downplay the effort the yankees put into the far western theater as it is perfectly comparable in size, and what was at the time importance, to the more famous operations conducted elsewhere. Lincoln knew that taking the far west would cripple southern commerce entirely because that is where they still had cotton, where they were war producing supplies, and where they were still shipping in and out of the ports. But Lincoln never could take it and failed repeatedly while trying. So instead he turned to the total war strategy of destruction exercised by Sherman and others.

277 posted on 07/24/2002 3:18:28 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
Regardless you cannot downplay the effort the yankees put into the far western theater as it is perfectly comparable in size, and what was at the time importance, to the more famous operations conducted elsewhere.

So there was an Army of the Potomac west of the Mississippi?

Like Jefferson Davis, you are ignoring one of the more important tenets espoused by Sun Tzu and Nathan Bedbug Forrest among others, -- He who defends all, defends nothing.

Walt

283 posted on 07/24/2002 7:36:37 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson