Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RELEASE THE DOCUMENTS
http://leboutillier.blogspot.com/ ^ | 21 July '02 | John LeBoutillier

Posted on 07/22/2002 5:54:20 AM PDT by rdavis84

Sunday, July 21, 2002  
RELEASE THE DOCUMENTS

President Bush – and the Republican Party – are in real trouble because of the stock market meltdown and the sure-to-follow economic slowdown, which threaten our control of the House this November.

But what imperils his presidency even more is his refusal to release all the documents relating to his Harken Energy stock sale back in 1990. He says that deal has been “vetted” and “nothing found.” OK, so why not take away a Democratic and media target – these so-far unreleased documents still sitting under lock and key inside the SEC – and get the focus off himself and back on the macro-problems of Wall Street?

Similarly, why doesn’t Vice President Dick Cheney open his Energy Task Force papers and show the world he, too, has nothing to hide?

We conservatives are begging the President and Vice President to take these issues away from the Democrats and the so-called ‘mainstream media’ by releasing all the documents and thus putting these issues in the rear-view mirror.

Instead, the Bush Administration has gone into total lockdown and behaves like a police state. In the past week we have the Feds ‘forcibly detaining’ a National Review reporter, Joel Mowbrey, inside the State Department for reporting on ‘easy’ visas obtained in Saudi Arabia, and federal agents running around Capitol Hill questioning elected members of the House and Senate about leaks from within the Bush Administration of Iraq war plans.

Why all the secrecy – especially from a Republican administration that should believe – unlike the grifter Clintons – in openness and honesty?

Let us examine what may be behind this politically damaging ‘stonewall’:

1) Harken Energy. G.W. Bush says he has “nothing to hide.” But he refuses to release those SEC documents and he won’t release Harken Energy board meeting minutes either. Furthermore, the broker who arranged the private sale of Bush’s stock still refuses – 11 years later – to name the buyer. Why?

2) Public records now show that in January 1990 Bahrain awarded Harken a potentially huge deal to drill there. Harken – and G.W. Bush – had never before drilled anywhere outside the USA. And, amazingly, Harken beat out Amoco for this contract.

DC insiders now are speculating that this contract was in fact a way to ingratiate Bahrain with then-President George Bush. And some even suspect that the June 1990 sale of Bush’s Harken stock to the still-secret buyer may have been yet another way for someone – Bahraini perhaps – to further make the Bush family happy.

What a scam that would have been! Award a contract, thus boosting the stock price, then buy the stock privately as a ‘backdoor payment.’

The 1991 SEC investigation of G.W. Bush was deemed “inconclusive.” Then why not release those documents and get rid of this news story?

3) Cheney’s Energy Task Force is now in federal court trying to suppress the minutes and meeting notes of its 2001 meetings. Why? What is to hide? Why are our fellow conservatives behaving like Hillary did during her Health Care Task Force back in 1993?

Why not make all these papers public and thus deprive our political enemies of the ammo to attack us?

Knowledgeable insiders have suspected that Enron and Halliburton had undue influence over the Cheney Task Force and may even have been working on a pre-9-11 pipeline deal with the Taliban to build a pipeline through Afghanistan.

Perhaps the Bush/Cheney Team is afraid that this revelation in the post-September 11 and post-Enron environment would have devastating political consequences.

But hiding and stonewalling almost always fail. It is always better to release everything and move on.

The Bush Administration is in real trouble. Some of these problems - Wall Street’s accounting frauds - are beyond their control.

But their own ‘secrecy’ and paranoid behavior are causing deep concern – even among their staunchest supporters. Many conservatives are beginning to wonder, “What are Bush and Cheney hiding?”

John LeBoutillier is a former U.S. Congressman (R) and a nationally recognized political commentator.

http://leboutillier.blogspot.com/


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: ffrancone

Oh yeah, I almost forgot!

Your recommendation itself is extremely sound. The only reason that Bush and Cheney are undergoing any kind of negative press right now is because it's July and there's nothing else to write about and the press tends to be resolutely partisan in its political affiliation.

Partisan Democrat, that is.

What vainglorious mountebanks such as John Leboutlierre fail to understand is that the press is a willing instrument of agitation and propaganda for the Democratic Party! He treats negative press stories as if they are legitimate, when they should be understood for what they are: the latest in focus group action at the DNC.

The Democrats aren't interested in Harken energy or Halliburton per se. That's not what motivates them. They want to get minutes out so they can administer the "death of a thousand cuts" during the fall campaign, as their minions in the bitch press "cast doubt" on every move Bush made at Harken.

And Good Christ, Cheney didn't sell his stock until the Times and the Post got on his ass to do so back in 2000! For God's sake, the mendacity of these people is nothing short of amazing.

LeBoutlierre himself hates Bush and the Bush family with a passion. He is the source of more bullcrap about Bush on the right than even those souls of caution over at LewRockwell.com. He ran for Congress from Massachussetts in 1980 , winning a seat in the Reagan landslide. He couldn't hold onto it to save his life, and was wasted by Tip O'Neill's political machine.

He is, altogether, a writer who leaves something to be desired.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

41 posted on 07/22/2002 6:53:12 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: section9
Chris:

Haven't seen you posting before. We sure think a lot alike. And, you write really well ("inner brownshirt" indeed, LOL). I'll be looking forward to reading more.

That said, I'm not ready to concede the Senate or the House in 2002. We have a good chance of controlling both narrowly. In that regard, watch for the TAKEBACKCONGRESS.ORG project PhiKapMom and I are working on. Coming your way soon :)

42 posted on 07/22/2002 7:19:17 PM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
But hiding and stonewalling almost always fail. It is always better to release everything and move on.

Was this guy living in a cave in the Clinton years?

43 posted on 07/22/2002 7:23:36 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
He makes good points. If the guys don't have anything to hide, they should defuse the situation post haste, and make it a complete and total non-issue for the Democrats.

If we had an objective press, you'd be right. But we don't and the press can take any information at all and make it look bad by for conservatives lying propaganda. The sheeple are too lazy to figure it out for themselves. Best not to release anything unless it's pertinent to the presidency or government. This isn't.

44 posted on 07/22/2002 7:27:16 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
Let me try again:

He makes good points. If the guys don't have anything to hide, they should defuse the situation post haste, and make it a complete and total non-issue for the Democrats.

If we had an objective press, you'd be right. But we don't and the press can take any information at all and make it look bad for conservatives by using lying propaganda. The sheeple are too lazy to figure it out for themselves. Best not to release anything unless it's pertinent to the presidency or government. This isn't.

45 posted on 07/22/2002 7:28:29 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson