1 posted on
07/21/2002 11:04:40 PM PDT by
sourcery
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Libertarianize the GOP
FYI
2 posted on
07/21/2002 11:06:24 PM PDT by
sourcery
To: *crevo_list
4 posted on
07/22/2002 12:06:05 AM PDT by
jennyp
To: sourcery
All sorts of things like this can be supposed when we get down to the quantum level. One problem is that we have to be nano-sized observers to make any use of it.
To: sourcery
The researchers used optical tweezers to grab hold of a micron-sized bead and drag it through water.
By measuring the motion of the bead and calculating the minuscule forces on it, the researchers were able to show that the bead was sometimes kicked by the water molecules in such a way that energy was transferred from the water to the bead. In effect, heat energy was extracted from the reservoir and used to do work (helping to move the bead) in apparent violation of the second law.
Something doesn't sound right here. I could have sworn the tweezers were moving the bead.
6 posted on
07/22/2002 5:36:09 AM PDT by
DH
To: sourcery
"One of the simplest is to note that it's impossible simply to extract the heat energy from some reservoir and use it to do work." It's also wrong. You can indeed extract the heat energy from a reservoir and use it to do work. You just can't get it all and you have to reject some of it to the environment, so you have an efficiency lower than some upper limit (the Carnot efficiency). But when did we expect journalists to get things right?
--Boris
8 posted on
07/22/2002 7:25:23 AM PDT by
boris
To: *RealScience
To: Physicist
Physics ping.
11 posted on
07/22/2002 9:34:57 AM PDT by
anymouse
To: RightWhale
This description of the experiment is easier to visualize than the one from the first article.
14 posted on
07/22/2002 5:18:12 PM PDT by
gcruse
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson