I've followed the trial pretty closely. It obviously bothers you that he was convicted, even though the evidence was overwhelming.
You'll probably get over it.
1). A former secret service agent speaking out in favor of Traficant when he has a lot more to gain by being quiet.
2). A witness that says that had he heard this agents testimony, testimony the judge in the trial would not allow in, he would not have voted to convict.
Forget the pointless matter of whether I will get over it or not. Blather is not a substitute for a well supported position. Please, what do you have on this? What is the overwhelming evidence?