Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soren; shred
"The 34 I quoted was based on info supplied by a freeper today for the S&P 500 as of Friday's close..."

That P/E figure came from BigCharts.com, you can click on this URL:

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=sp500&sid=0&o_symb=sp500

36 posted on 07/21/2002 1:28:13 PM PDT by GaltMeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: GaltMeister; Soren
Here ya go, direct from the horse's mouth:

http://www.spglobal.com/earnings.html


As you can see, many ways to distort the actual figure for
the S&P p/e.

My question is, since as of March 2002, when the market was at it's peak for the year, the S&P itself says "operating" p/e was 16 and "as reported" was 36, and since then, earnings have improved (albeit slightly) and the market has dived, shouldn't those ratios already be markedly lower for TTM figures as of July?

shred
38 posted on 07/21/2002 1:49:22 PM PDT by shred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson