And If the FBI finally releases the surveillance videos of McVeigh that witnesses say would show him with swarthy Mr John Doe #2 you would claim that the other man was digitally added to the video so we could attack Iraq. It's never ending with people like you.
And yeah, you could have done something right a long time ago by simply discussing and trying to refute facts and not attacking the author and messenger. Since you didn't do that, you raised suspicion as to your own curious motives and the tables were turned back on you.
It's very strange that someone would be so upset that Iraq, Iran or Al Qaeda activity in spring 1995 is now, after 9-11 hurt us, being examined *and new clues found* while the FBI was repeatedly seen over the years to be asleep at the wheel (and is still half asleep). You seem to have a stake in protecting the Islamist terrorists and keeping the focus on old news.
As it is with gullible fools like you that will accept third or fourth hand information of what so and so said or did, or has a document. Its pathetic. Kind of like Michael Rivero.
You seem to have a stake in protecting the Islamist terrorists and keeping the focus on old news.
No stake at all. I would just as soon see Iraq flattened, the Mullahs in Tehran wiped out, and Al Qaeda drawn and quartered and then buried among Pork grinds. My deal is I have a real problem with nutzo "True Believers" that will believe anything any one tells them but will then demand proof from those that think they are full of shit.
For example I could make up as factual a case for the fact that the transister and most of the technology of the past fourty years is the result of back engineering of Alien technology and I would be just as factual as your professors thought piece. Get some indictments and I might buy into it.