Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Domestic Church
I can kind of see it. Wedging open the door with Sons to carry on the family name or inherit the Property.

(After all, It's the Economy, Stupid.)

But I still wonder whether that's just a way to appeal to human nature (being made in God's image and prizing the first born son) or whether it also is part and parcel of the State's interest in males over females.

For if the State were interested in some parity, it would seem China would force folks to keep a certain amount of girls rather than look the other way as folks abort, abandon or kill their female children to obtain a boy. They don't seem to have any problems with an excruciatingly, overwhelmingly male population.

For exactly what purposes it's hard to say. Fewer female definitely puts the brakes on procreation, beefs up the military with real muscle and encourages the homosexuality that is the State's ideal in many respects. I don't know. Still thinking about that one.

If I manage to dig up anything resembing Chicom encouragement of females, we'll see if there's a clue there.

23 posted on 07/20/2002 2:25:12 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Askel5
For exactly what purposes it's hard to say. Fewer female definitely puts the brakes on procreation, beefs up the military with real muscle and encourages the homosexuality that is the State's ideal in many respects. I don't know. Still thinking about that one.

Get out your ancient history of Sparta. Aristotle notes it at some length in the Politics; I think Thucydides gives it a whirl too, but I don't know him. Xenophon has something to say on it (calling them the Persians) in the Cyropaedia, and I think in the Anabasis, but I don't know that one either.

47 posted on 07/20/2002 4:30:50 PM PDT by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Askel5
"For exactly what purposes it's hard to say. Fewer female definitely puts the brakes on procreation, beefs up the military with real muscle..."

Drones?

This would be hilarious if it weren't so scary, I can just see John Cleese in a human drone piece.
52 posted on 07/20/2002 5:47:31 PM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson