[stylin_geek]

And NOW rails against the use of female skin, because it is sexist. I kind of wonder where they would come down on this? Also, for those liberals who oppose those who use their looks for gain, (it's exploitation, you know) I would think it is obvious that again, we have a good looking person, and this is about all they have going for themselves.

[ovrtaxt]

And NOW rails against the use of female skin, because it is sexist. I kind of wonder where they would come down on this? Also, for those liberals who oppose those who use their looks for gain, (it's exploitation, you know) I would think it is obvious that again, we have a good looking person, and this is about all they have going for themselves.

NOW doesn't care. they didn't care about Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, et al.Its not about women's rights, it not about eating animals, it's about government control.

[Oldeconomybuyer]