Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LABOR UNIONS, REPUBLICANS SCARE OFF INSLEE ROADLESS AMENDMENT
News Release Congressman James Hansen (Utah) ^ | July 18, 2002 | Shifflett

Posted on 07/19/2002 7:48:22 AM PDT by madfly

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: CPT Clay
Investigate Cantwell for illgotten gains in the pumpndump tech bubble.

I've long thought the same thing. Go after her hard and heavy.

I'm sure I remember something a little funny about her corp.

21 posted on 07/19/2002 10:42:38 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the ping! BTTT
22 posted on 07/19/2002 11:54:16 AM PDT by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Inslee needs to be voted out! Hope the folks in Washington will see this and put in somebody that actually has Washington's best interests at heart,

I'm in Washington, and some of us despise Inslee, but there are others who vote for him and Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell. None of them care about the state; their highest duty seems to be to the Communist Party. The state is broke, logging and fishing are virtually destroyed, Boeing has left, Internap is leaving, and they wonder where the money is.

23 posted on 07/19/2002 1:24:34 PM PDT by angry elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: madfly
One step at a time. At least it's a start.
24 posted on 07/19/2002 6:19:00 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I am so glad to see this - this roadless stuff is part of the reason we are having all these forest fires - no access to the wilderness areas for proper maintenance.
25 posted on 07/19/2002 9:56:08 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly

Hell is frozen, I just found something Clinton didn't want to fund.

Oh my..

And this "backfires" idea is interesting to me. I mean, if you can set a controlled fire in the path of a raging wildfire, will you not deprive it of fuel and effectively create a barrier?

I think that sounds like a great idea.. Provided it can be controlled with some degree of certainty.

EG: You burn the woods on the outskirts of town slowly today, so it can't burn quickly tomorrow when the flamefront hits it and take the town with it.

Sounds brilliant.

26 posted on 07/19/2002 10:01:36 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bttt
27 posted on 07/20/2002 7:04:45 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson