Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nebullis
In literature, that would be called 'poetic license' in Science, it is just called Evolutionary Theory. I call it a bunch of Barbara Streisand.

Let them explain how that creature developed feathers from scales, or went from cold-blooded to warm-blooded, or from solid boned to hollow-boned, or speeded up its metabolism by a factor of 10X, or lost its long tail, or.........you get the idea.

If any of these systems was not FULLY and SIMULTANEOUSLY developed, the creature would be an unworkable mutation and would die quickly. Oh yeah, another thing. There would have to be a FULLY DEVELOPED female and male existing at the same time to reproduce. Even then, the offspring would be just as likely to revert to the grandparents traits (ie: the old creature) as to continue the mother and fathers traits.

Absolutely unworkable. But you have to admire the Evo's strong faith!

27 posted on 07/18/2002 9:12:41 PM PDT by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: keithtoo
Absolutely unworkable. But you have to admire the Evo's strong faith!

Good points! I think the scientific community that still pushes evolution know that their argument is filled with holes, yet they push forward hoping something will turn-up that will solidify their theory. The problem is, every time the Paleo's unearth something new, it seems to further disprove evolution. And I think most individuals that can think for themselves realize that micro-evolution is occurring around us all the time, by many species --the ability to adapt to our surroundings and environment was designed! What the evo's can't prove is MACRO-evolution.

But back to the 'find'. What a wonderful creature! I want more pics. Keep 'em flowin everyone. What other beautiful masterpieces does the Creator have in store for us to unearth? We can only wait and see.

MM

43 posted on 07/18/2002 9:50:56 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: keithtoo
Absolutely unworkable. But you have to admire the Evo's strong faith!

Evolution, and the Redneck Watermelon Truck

The story goes that two old boys named Luke and Ray-Bob had themselves a truck and were buying watermelons in Fla. and Ga. for $2 and trucking them to Chicago and Detroit and selling them for $2. After awhile, they noticed that they were not making any money; naturally enough, they had a big business meeting and came to the conclusion that they needed a bigger truck.

Evolutionists, of course, are using time in precisely the same manner in which the two rednecks are using truck size, and there is no real reason for anybody to take them any more seriously than they would take the two rednecks.

Now, You couldn't easily prove that Luke and Ray-Bob couldn't possibly make money buying and selling for $2 since they could always say they merely needed the next size bigger truck. There is one thing which would really demolish their case however: that, God forbid, would be for somebody like Algor to get elected president and immediately outlaw the internal combustion engine; after THAT, guaranteed, nobody would ever make money trucking watermelons from Florida to Chicago and selling them for what they paid for them.

Likewise, If comebody could provide a coercive case for the fact that American Indians dealt with dinosaurs on a regular basis, then the time-frames which evolutionists so love to use as a magic wand to enable their doctrines would be demolished, the entire doctrine of evolutionism, broken. Not that there is any lack of logical proofs that no amount of time would suffice for macro-evolution but, without those time scales, no version of evolution is even thinkable, much less possible.


In this regard, evolutionists and geologists would appear to have developed a sort of a dinosaur-in-the-livingroom problem over the last few years. Take the case of Mishipishu, the "Water panther" for instance.

Petroglyphs show him with the dorsal blades of the stegosaur and Indian legends speak of him using his "great spiked tail" as a weapon. Remarkably, the Canadian national parks which maintain these pictographs are unaware of the notion of interpreting Mishipishu as a stegosaur, and refer to him only as a "manatou", or water spirit.

Vine Deloria is probably the best known native American author of the last half century or so. He is a past president of the National Council of American Indians, and several of his books, including the familiar "Custer Died for Your Sins", are standard university texts on Indian affairs.

One of Vine's books, "Red Earth, White Lies", is a book about catastrophism and about the great North American megaufauna extinctions which occurred around 12000 years ago (using conventional dating). In this book, Vine utterly destroys the standard "overkill" and "blitzkrieg" hypotheses which are used to explain these die-outs.

Vine informs me that "Red Earth, White Lies" is one of several books which arise from decades of research including conversations with nearly every story-teller and keeper of oral traditions from Alaska down to Central and South America. He tells me that, if there was one thing which used to completely floor him early on in this research, it was the extent to which most of these tribes retain oral traditions of Indians having to deal not only with pleistocene megafauna, but with dinosaurs as well. In "Red Earth, White Lies", he notes (pages 242-243) that:

Indians generfly speak with a precise and literal imagery. As a rule, when trying to identify creatures of the old stories, they say they are "like" familiar neighborhood animals, but then carefully differentiate the perceived differences. I have found that if the animal being described was in any way comparable to modern animals, that similarity would be pointed out; the word "monster" would not be used.

Only in instances where the creature bears no resemblance to anything we know today will it be described as a monster. Since no dinosaur shape resembles any modern animal, and since the reports are to be given literal credibility I must suggest that we are identifying a dinosaur. Thus, in the story of large animals at Pomme de Terre prairie in southwestern Missouri, a variant of the story suggests that the western animals were megafauna and the creatures who crossed the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers and invaded the lands of the megafauna were dinosaurs. The dinosaurs thus easily displace the familiar, perhaps Pleistocene, megafauna and move west, where we find their remains in the Rocky Mountains today

In numerous places in the Great Lakes are found pictographs of a creature who has been described in the English translation as the "water panther" This animal has a saw-toothed back and a benign, catlike face in many of the carvings. Various deeds are attributed to this panther, and it seems likely that the pictographs of this creature which are frequently carved near streams and lakes are a warning to others that a water panther inhabits that body of water. The Sioux have a tale about such a monster in the Missouri River. According to reports, the monster had ". . . red hair all over its body . . . and its body was shaped like that of a buffalo. It had one eye and in the middle of its forehead was one horn. Its backbone was just like a cross- cut saw; it was flat and notched like a saw or cogwheel" I suspect that the dinosaur in question here must be a stegosaurus.


Then there is the case of the Brontosaur Pictograph on rough stone.

This petroglyph, in fact, first came to light with the Doheney Expedition to Java Supai, the report of which comes not from the National Enquirer, but from the Peabody Muscum of American Ethnology at Harvard University.

Then there is the case of the man and brontosaur petroglyph at the Natural Bridges National Monument in Utah:

A book on Indian rock art sold atthe park visitors center notes:

"There is a petroglyph in Natural Bridges National Monument that bears a startling resemblance to dinosaur, specifically a Brontosaurus, with a long tail and neck, small head and all." (Prehistoric Indians, Barnes and Pendleton, 1995, p.201) The desert varnish, which indicates age, is especially heavy over this section.

Then again, there is the picture which the people at Bible.ca snapped of Don Patten with the petroglyph of the triceroptops:

And the pterodactyle at San Rafael Swell in Black Dragon Wash, Utah:

Like I say, it's never been easy to be an evolutionist, and it's not getting any easier.

60 posted on 07/19/2002 5:34:41 AM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: keithtoo
If any of these systems was not FULLY and SIMULTANEOUSLY developed, the creature would be an unworkable mutation and would die quickly. Oh yeah, another thing.

Wrong, but keep telling yourself that if it gives you some comfort.

There would have to be a FULLY DEVELOPED female and male existing at the same time to reproduce.

Utter nonsense. Back to biology class with you.

Even then, the offspring would be just as likely to revert to the grandparents traits (ie: the old creature) as to continue the mother and fathers traits.

You reveal a gross lack of knowledge of basic biology and heredity, much less evolution.

As soon as you understand any of those topics better, you'll have a chance to make an actual informed opinion on them.

Until then, you're engaging in class straw man fallacies, although in your case it appears to be based on your honest misunderstanding instead of an intentionally dishonest presentation.

94 posted on 07/20/2002 3:59:58 AM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson