You spout the same tired old religious crap as all the rest of the "creation nuts". We're talking SCIENCE, here, not religion. That is the point you crackpots can't seem to get through your granite skulls. I have NEVER heard a scientist, speaking as a scientist, talking aobut "mother Earth"--the only ones I know who use that language on a regular basis are the eco-nutcases. Anybody who actually understands the science behind evolutionary change would NEVER make the statement "the wonders of evolutionary design".
"Take a closer look at your camp before throwing stones at someone else's."
FIRST, you have to have a camp. You folks have none.
Frankly, I am sick and tired of having this creationist bullbleep constantly show up in "Breaking News". Such threads belong in the "Religion" interest section.
If You take a purely OBJECTIVE view of the creationist model (yes, it's a model), you can reverse engineer the timeline. When you do this, you will find that it fits the Bible. Creation scientists look at evidence- the exact and uncompromising science of what is there- and then see if it will fit with the Biblical record. Every time, IT DOES.
Like I said earlier, the evolutionists hit a constant reef of mysteries and disproven hypotheses, while making new discoveries which disprove old patterns of thinking. This is held up as proof that they're 'open minded', that they have no agenda. But when a creationist offers them a system that works, they discount it because it happens to fit with the Bible. Evolutionists are just as 'religious' as anybody. Secular Humanism ring a bell? The elevation of man as his own god? The mindset is the same, the trappings are different. (By the way, Jesus is always leading people out of 'religion'. It prevents free thought. I hope you know what I mean by this.)
Now then, please reconcile the problem with genetics that I mentioned earlier. Tell me, from a geneticists perspective, how one species mutates into another over time. It's IMPOSSIBLE. You will find very few geneticists who support evolution. (But the secular humanist church of science education won't tell you this.)
As for bullpleep, if evolution is a process, then it has no design nor logic guiding it. Your leading thinkers lend religious words and deeds to a process that supposedly is driven by genes and need.
And yes, ALOT of evolutionists call evolution's process as 'Evolutions' design' and other such drivel. Please, don't deny it. I'm sorry I sound like I am knocking your religion, but get a grip. Go back and read the article, THEN speak something intelligent. Or you can go back to the byssal ooze that is so worshipped (:-P among your 'camp'.