What I am always amazed at is why evolutionists have to constantly put down those who do not believe in evolution instead of just giving proof that evolution is true. The reason for that is that there is no proof of evolution. Even after 150 years of claiming evolution is true evolutionists cannot give one single example of a species that has transformed itself into another more complex species.
That does speak volumes. No matter what internet forum the creation/evolution debate is held, most evolutionists try to ridicule all opponents. Some evolutionists will drop the ridicule game but that evolutionist is the exception. According to most evolutionists, if someone doesn't "buy" the theory of evolution that person doesn't understand it. Or the evolutionist will claim that person hasn't read anything on the topic because if they had they would accept it. Some of the more arrogant evolutionists will try to tell the anti-evolutionists what they should or what they do believe. That always makes me laugh.
From all the hype we've heard on evolution one would think the evolutionists have a huge pile of supporting evidence. When asked for evidence, the evolutionist provides links or evidence that the objective reader looks at and asks again, where is the evidence for evolution? I encourage anyone reading to go read the "evolution evidence" links provided earlier on this thread. You'll see exactly what I mean. When you call the evolutionist on it they'll change the subject in some desperate attempt to support their theory.
Here's a quote from an evolutionist on this forum:
Lack of evidence isn't evidence against my theory, no matter how inconvenient you find that to be.Some evolutionists use subjectivity and bias to get the results they want in order to further their agenda. When you look at the major proponents of evolution in academia and the media you'll notice a common theme: atheism. That doesn't mean everyone who "buys" the theory of evolution is an atheist, it demonstrates it is atheists who are leading the evolution "charge." The concept of God does not fit into the atheists agenda which should raise a red flag for anyone who believes in God.