[ovrtaxt]

the big problem that evolutionists have is genetics. the actual mechanics of cell reproduction on a molecular level has done more to undermine faith in evolution as a theory of origination than all the painted pictures and so on. that stuff is just supporting evidence.

when I watch a PBS or Discovery channel documentary (where evolution is pushed ad nauseum), I can sit there and blow holes in their logic without trying. But if you take the same data that they quote and plug it into a creationism model, it usually fits every time.

I don't see what the big deal is with adandoning evolution. Why the emotional attachment?It must have something to do with an innate resistance of scientists to 'religion'. I think it's a refusal to be confronted with the possibility that the Bible may be true. Scientists, feeling a need to think a matter through and formulate a system of logic, have used evolution as a shield against the conviction of God.

[Wonder Warthog]

"when I watch a PBS or Discovery channel documentary (where evolution is pushed ad nauseum), I can sit there and blow holes in their logic without trying. But if you take the same data that they quote and plug it into a creationism model, it usually fits every time."

ANYTHING will "fit" a "creationist model". Unfortunately, no "creationist model" is science. It has zip to do with "emotional attachment". All "creationist models" are religion--not science.