The Color of Money
US News and World Report
by Stephen J. Hedges
March 16, 1992
"Enter Quahsa. The son of an affluent American lawyer in the Phillipines, Alan Quasha brought Harken some impressive financial backers. They included money manager George Soros, who would come to hold a 30.4 percent stake; Harvard Management Co., who would control another 30.4 percent share, and Abduliah Taha Bakhsh, a Saudi investor with 21.4 percent. Harken bought Spectrum out in 1986, trading stock for Spectrum assets. Bush received $600,000 in Harken shares, but his stake would actually be worth much more.
Sweet Deals
As is the case with many executive compensation packages, the key to Harken’s is the stock options. But very few companies offer terms as sweet. For starters, Harken offers select executives, including Bush, eight year loans at 5% interest. The loans may be used by the company brass to exercise options to purchase Harken shares. Bush has borrowed $180,375. At Harken, loans are sometimes forgiven. The board forgave $72,000 in non-interest-bearing loans to employees in 1989, and $269,000 in 1990.
The deal gets sweater still. Harken allows select executives and directors like Bush, who exercise their options, to purchase stock at a 40 percent discount; most U.S. companies allow executives to purchase their companies stock at current market value. Harken says it is because the stock is not registered and therefore cannot be traded. But in March 1990, Harken registered 1.8 million option shares. "Unusual," says Paula Todd of Towers Perrin, a compensation consulting firm, when asked about Harken compensation. "This definitely is not a cookie-cutter plan." Graef Crystal, a vocal critic of excessive executive pay, has harsher words: "This is a tremendous package for a little tiny company. Their stock has been growing at 4.9% per year when the market is growing at 15 percent. That is rotten performance."
Given Harken’s troubles, it might appear that owning its stock isn’t much of a bargain. However, Harken’s liberal option program makes it profitable. On June 22, 1990, for instance, Bush sold $848,560 worth of stock, which was trading at $4 a share. Even with a $180,375 loan to pay back, Bush realized $668,185 on the sale. He still owns 105,012 Harken shares.
Harken has launched several deals involving its largest shareholders. The most complex was a major reorganization through the sale of two subsidiaries, E-Z Serve, a chain of gas stations, and Tejas Power, a natural-gas supplier.
First, companies tied to Alan Quasha and Harvard Management lent Harken $46 million. Harken used $15 million of that money to retire E-Z Serve debt. It spent $28 million more on capital improvements at E-Z Serve and Tejas stock. Harken kept the remaining $3 million. The company then gave its shareholders rights to buy E-Z Serve and Tejas stock. An agreement stipulated that any stock not purchased by the shareholders could be bought at a discount of at least 3 percent by two companies affiliated with Quasha and Harvard. But Quasha and Harvard controlled 55.6 percent of Harken stock. By not exercising the rights to buy it immediately, they effectively gave themselves the built-in discount. Harvard Management declines to discuss the deal.
There is substantial evidence to suggest that Bush knew Harken was in dire straits in the weeks before he sold the $848,560 of Harken stock. For one, Harken’s board has appointed Bush and another director, E. Stuart Watson, as a "fairness committee" to determine whether the restructuring would adversely affect ordinary shareholders. The committee, which first met in May 1990, worked closely with financial advisors form Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., which had concluded by that time that only drastic action could save Harken. Even before then, however, Harken’s SEC filings make it clear that the company’s directors knew radical steps were necessary. One informed source says Harken’s creditors had threatened to foreclose on the company if substantial debt payments were not made. Harken’s treasurer, Dale Brooks strenuously denies any suggestion that creditors were poised to seize the company."