To: EBITDA
"Would you give a group 30 mil and not want some direct oversight? It happens all the time for much less than $30 million."
That also goes for Soros and the Arab, doesn't it?
12 posted on
07/18/2002 9:10:46 AM PDT by
rdavis84
To: rdavis84
Gee, I guess I am totally wrong. It has become obvious that Bush and Soros and the Arab were simply using Harken to funnel money into Al-Quaida. They probably used the board meetings to plan the 9/11 hijackings. Bush left to run for president just for a cover if anyone ever traced the terrorism money trail back to Harken. And it is also obvious that O'Reilly is acting as a shill for Bush and Soros. Jeez.
For crying out loud. Frankly I think there is more evil in the suspicious hositility toward people with money than in the average corporate boardroom of US companies.
No doubt Bush and his Daddy are 'connected'. does that make them evil? I doubt it. Does it co-opt them? It's possible, but in this case I reallly don't think so. But what do I know, I certainly don't have the kind of insight into individual motivation that you might find on the editorial pages of the New York Times or the Washington Post.
15 posted on
07/18/2002 10:30:22 AM PDT by
EBITDA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson