Skip to comments.
Homeland Security or KGB??
WorldNetDaily ^
| July 17, 2002
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 07/17/2002 6:38:19 PM PDT by ninenot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: ninenot
Hell yes.
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: DugwayDuke
Honestly, I love the idea. Especially since this will piss off so many conservatives that I will be the Queen soon, can't you smell it?
< balogna >I won't tell on you, if you don't tell on me, OK? < /balogna >
To: BJClinton
Actually his scenario is plausible. I see from your profile that you live in TX. Visit NE NJ or NYC for a while. Most of my coworkers can't *wait* to either vote for Gore or Hillary. They'd fall all over one another turning me in because I'm pro-life (might blow up a clinic or something) and pro-gun (why's she need guns? the cops will protect her, maybe she just wants to shoot an abortionist!). These are the same people, one of whom *cried* when Gore conceeded because she'd have to have back alley abortions. She'd TIPs me in a heartbeat if Hillary were president.
The big difference between this and telephone snooping and bank record snooping (not that that can't be fiddled) is that it's completely subjective based on the *opinion* of an individual that might not know you all that well, or have a grudge against you. This type of information is usually not as valuable as the first type. Now, multiply times 1 million tipsters. You just think the airport security nazis are out of control, now imagine that in the cable guy, the meter reader, the postman, the schoolbus driver...etc.
To: ninenot
It is going to get interesting around here....
To: ninenot
yeah, but the POSTMAN??? On the positive side, if a mail carrier does inform on someone, the person will have long since moved or died by the time the tip reaches Washington.
To: ninenot
Intelligence Debriefing: The East German Stasi.
The infamous Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, a.k.a. the Stasi, was established in April 1950. Similar in structure to the then- operating NKVD (predecessor to the KGB), the Stasi was the secret police force for the communist-controlled German Democratic Republic. The Stasi used a huge network of informants to repress the citizens of East Germany. It was not uncommon for members of families to spy on each other for fear of blackmail, as a result of physical threats and even because of monetary rewards from the secret police force. In the late 80s, the Stasi had nearly 175,000 official informants on their books, roughly one informant for every 100 people. (Some estimate the size of the unofficial Stasi informant force as nearly 10 times this level.) The Stasi maintained a force of over 90,000 uniformed and plain-clothes agents.
Aside from their internal operations, the Stasi, in coordination with the KGB, collected external intelligence. (During the early ,80s, the new President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, then a KGB operative, participated in this type of intelligence gathering. See Russians put their faith in Putin, above.) The key targets of the Stasis external efforts were the U.S. occupational forces in Berlin, U.S. and NATO forces in West Germany, the West German government and military and political bodies of other Western European countries. The operations of the Stasi, the uniforms they wore and the geographical situation of East and West Berlin made them the perfect ever-present bad guys of many Cold War spy novels. However, their portrayal in print was only a shadow of their true and far-reaching influence. In 1990, when West and East Germany were reunited, the Stasi was dissolved. Many sought retribution for the pain, suffering and even loss of life caused by the East German secret police through the court system. However, a final decision by the unified German court in 1995 stated that former Stasi officials could not be prosecuted for taking part in or conducting Cold War espionage against the West.
|
[ Back ] [ Home ] [ Next ] |
27
posted on
07/17/2002 7:14:04 PM PDT
by
handk
To: ninenot
Welcome to the USSA...
28
posted on
07/17/2002 7:14:41 PM PDT
by
ibme
To: Texasforever
Lemme ask, are you white, male, and conservative? If so, you just nailed the common perception of the McVeigh profile. Own any guns? wow, you might shoot up an abortion clinic or one of those peaceful mosques. Gotta report you ASAP!
Know how the airport security goons almost *never* pick likely suspects for searches? You my friend would be TIPsed because you are white, male and conservative.
To: Black Agnes
You are NOT listening. The ability to make bogus reports and to target white male conservatives are already in place! All ya gotta do is pick up the damned phone.
To: Black Agnes
The big difference between this and telephone snooping and bank record snooping Sadly, it's not a big difference, it's just another step along a road we've been walking. We've already lost many of our liberties under "special circumstances" (e.g., to "protect the children.")
With federal asset forfeiture, they no longer need to give you due process, or a trial. We've resurrected "debtor's prison" with child support (the govt can jail someone for not earning enough money). Hate crime laws are eroding free speech (the day will come when Bible passages will be considered "hate speech" -- it's already happening in Scandanavia).
All sorts of liberties have been lost in the fight against "terrorists, child molesters, hate criminals, drug traffickers, internet porn." The state always picks the most abhorent example to create an exception to the Constitution, then expands that exception to ... everyone.
To: Texasforever
The ability to make bogus reports and to target white male conservatives are already in place! So let's roll back the state infrastructor, rather then expand it.
To: Texasforever
Centralization *is* the key here. YOU are not listening. Before the STASI, there certainly were ways of reporting crime. STASI wasn't about reporting crime, it was about scaring your neighbor and everyone living in *fear* of what some pissant government official might think or do. Just think of all the wonders of the press generated 'horrors' or McCarthyism, only now the questions will be 'are you now or have you ever been a conservative/gunowner/Christian/etc'? If the means are *already* in place *why* this special operation? Do you honestly think Hillary/Gore wouldn't go for broke with this one?
To: Black Agnes
I give up. Yes we are behind the iron curtain.
To: dalebert
The ATF, believe me.
To: dalebert
The ATF, believe me.
To: Texasforever
Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
37
posted on
07/17/2002 7:42:01 PM PDT
by
ellery
To: ninenot
Had we been more vigilant in our immigration policy or if we had a coherent immigration policy for that matter the word "American" would not appear in this article.
To get a flavor for this supposition copy the article to a word processor, replace the words American(s) and citizen(s) with the word foreign national(s) or illegal alien(s) and then reread the article.
To: Black Agnes
I suppose this could turn into a shouting match that won't get much accomplished. Do we have any hard evidence of the structure it's going to take?
As I understand it, reports go into a database for federal law-enforcement agencies. How will the information be vetted? There are questions that still need to be answered about the whole program. I went to the website
http://www.citizenscorp.gov/ and it pulled up nothing. Is there any real info other than the hysteria?
To: ellery
A penny saved is a penny earned. I can do clichés' also.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson