[dirtboy]

Hi, 'Pod. I agree entirely about Harken, as far as Halliburton goes, it's too early to tell, so I'm withholding judgement, but I haven't seen enough yet to call it a scandal. And the charge that Turley is simply trying to stay in the media by attacking the Bush Administration is quite possible. However, these matters happened BEFORE Bush and Cheney were public officials, and his criticisms of Gonzales and Fleischer are, IMO, worth considering.

Instead, we see folks come barging into the thread, many of whom seem to not have bothered reading the article, and immediately commence the ad hominem attacks against Turley because he has left the reservation.

[sauropod]

Turley did characterize the White House as "reeling." I don't buy that, and his whole article was suspect from then on.

[Howlin]

Instead, we see folks come barging into the thread, many of whom seem to not have bothered reading the article

Barging? Well, why don't you invite who you want to post on your threads?

Did it ever occur to you that there are those of us who HAVE done our homework on Halliburton and don't need to be told, yet again, that something might be wrong by somebody who hasn't kept up with what's going on?

This forum is KNEE DEEP in article about it; perhaps you should scroll through them and see how the "valued Freepers" on this forum have debunked this POLITICALLY MOTIVATED charges.

This article is nothing more than piling on by Turley.